Home Up One Level What's New? Q & A Short Essays Holocaust Denial Guest Book Donations Multimedia Links

The Holocaust History Project.
The Holocaust History Project.

FRENCH CHILDREN OF THE HOLOCAUST

A memorial
Serge Klarsfeld  

 
Previous Page Back  Contents  Contents Page 40 Home Page Home Page  Forward Next Page 
     
First, the number of Jews arrested is far short of the German demands accepted by Bousquet and Laval. Between 20,000 and 22,000 arrests were anticipated, but the count of arrested adults in the agreed age ranges yields 8,833 potential deportees. To increase the number, the raids would have to be resumed, though they would be less effective because stateless Jews who escaped arrest would be on their guard. The SS expect their schedule for the dispatch of deportation trains to be respected; the French judge it best to give them a suitable number of Jewish heads by adding the 4,000 children. The 13,000 total including the children will still be short of the 22,000 sought, but it will gain time and avert conflict with the Germans. It is clear that if the French insist on deporting the children, the Gestapo will report it and Berlin will know in advance that there will be no official French opposition to the policy.

Second, failure to deport the children would involve the police and the Vichy administration in the material problems of their long-term lodging, care and feeding, education, and legal status. (However, for several days, the abominable treatment of Jewish families in the Vel d'Hiv is proof of the negligence and incompetence of the French officials involved.)

For Leguay, François, and Tulard, it is absolutely necessary that the children be deported. If they are not, a problem will be created that will last for years. In addition, if one day the Germans are defeated, these children become adults will ask what has happened to their parents and will demand judgment of the French officials responsible for their disappearance.

The children must be deported, and quickly, so that French officials will be involved with them as briefly as possible. In the Loiret camps where the children will be sent, Leguay, François, Tulard, and the Orléans Prefecture all have failed to make preparations for their arrival; nor, in a region that is one of France's granaries, have they arranged sufficient food for them; nor do they concern themselves with proper hygiene or health conditions, and many of these 4,000 children very quickly will become ill. Some will find their deaths here in the Loiret within a few weeks and will be buried in individual or common graves in local cemeteries. Finally, these officials will deliberately plunge these thousands of children into frightful emotional distress when they separate them from their mothers.

The third consideration that certainly must weigh in the French decision is a fear of public knowledge of the coming separation of families. Darquier's proposal to send the children to shelters in Paris and its suburbs would make it necessary to separate children and parents at the Vel d'Hiv. There are terrible scenes ahead, and it will be less disagreeable to have them played out far away, hidden behind the barbed wire of the Loiret camps. Parisians will have no knowledge of these events, and their compassion for Jewish families will not be reinforced. On returning home in the evening, Paris policemen will not be talking about the scenes of hysteria they provoked during the day. (When the time comes to deport the mothers, French police at the Loiret camps, more or less isolated from the local population, will use their rifle butts to separate them from their children and pack them into sealed boxcars. It would be three weeks before boxcars would be sent for the children.)
    
   

FRENCH CHILDREN OF THE HOLOCAUST

A memorial
Serge Klarsfeld

 
Previous Page  Back Page 40 Forward  Next Page

   

Last modified: March 9, 2008
Technical/administrative contact: webmaster@holocaust-history.org