Home Up One Level What's New? Q & A Short Essays Holocaust Denial Guest Book Donations Multimedia Links

The Holocaust History Project.
The Holocaust History Project.

THE STRUTHOF ALBUM

STUDY OF THE GASSING AT NATZWEILER-STRUTHOF
by Jean-Claude Pressac  

 
Previous Page Back  Page 8 Home Page Home Page  Forward Next Page 
     
Pierre Henripierre, a civilian employee at the Institute of Anatomy, has testified that the bodies were brought there by truck in three lots: 30 women the first time, then 30 men, and finally another 26 men. The 86 corpses were spread among six vats full of synthetic alcohol at 55 degrees Centigrade and not formol [formaldehyde] as is often believed. One skeleton was missing at the roll-call. An “incident” had occurred when one of the groups was being pushed into the gas chamber. Someone resisted and was slaughtered by an SS-man’s pistol fire. The “spoiled” body was not sent to Strasbourg.

After its “homicidal” use, the gas chamber recovered a measure of scientific “respectability”. In the fall of 1943, ten experiments to test for protection against phosgene by hexamethylene tetramine (urotropine) administered both orally and parenterally, were conducted by Professor Bickenbach under conditions that did not cause any deaths. A gas sampling tube had been installed in the door, for the purpose of measuring the concentration of phosgene in the gas chamber. On the 15 June 1944, four more experiments were undertaken by Professor Hirt. They caused four deaths by acute oedema of the lungs, not because, as some historians have thought, the phosgene concentration was much higher, but because they were under Hirt’s brutal “direction”. Bickenbach gave his subjects phials containing up to 8 grams of phosgene, with inhalation for 20 minutes in a 20m³ room, with no mishaps except for slight oedemas. Hirt caused one death with the administration of a 2.7 g phial over a 25 minute inhalation period, and was responsible for 3 more deaths with a 10.14 g phial administered for 30 minutes.

Let us try now to understand the discrepancy between Joseph Kramer’s two depositions. At the Belsen trial he again furnished two often contradictory versions. Do we then conclude that he was lying each time? It is not hard to see where the truth lies, by comparing the following two extracts on the subject of Auschwitz, where Kramer was commandant of sector B.II of Birkenau from mid-May to the 29 November 1944. In a first deposition he states:
“I have heard allegations by ex-prisoners from Auschwitz regarding a gas chamber, mass executions and floggings, regarding the cruelty of the guards, and that all of this supposedly took place in my presence or that I had knowledge of it. All I can say on the subject is that these are falsehoods from start to finish.”
   
   

THE STRUTHOF ALBUM

STUDY OF THE GASSING AT NATZWEILER-STRUTHOF
By Jean-Claude Pressac

 
Previous Page  Back Page 8 Forward  Next Page

    

Last modified: July 17, 2008
Technical/administrative contact: webmaster@holocaust-history.org