Home Up One Level What's New? Q & A Short Essays Holocaust Denial Guest Book Donations Multimedia Links

The Holocaust History Project.
The Holocaust History Project.

WHEREVER THEY MAY BE
© 1972, The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation
 
 
Previous Page Back  Contents  Contents Page 86 Home Page Home Page  Forward Next Page 
     
even hears her. Socialist Karl Schiller himself never succeeded in upsetting Kiesinger's aplomb, but the young people of the APO, who can be counted on the fingers of one hand, are doing so."

August 19. With Arno beside me I held a press conference in Berlin. My book, Kiesinger, a Documentation, had just been published – six days before my second trial before the Court of Appeals. I emphasized this coincidence. I had on several occasions met Karl Gerold, the publisher of the Frankfurter Rundschau, who was a good friend of Brandt and a former anti-Nazi emigré. Now he was convinced, and he gave me a whole page in his courageous and popular newspaper. I used it for an exhaustive article on "Kiesinger and the 'Final Solution.'" Gerold himself, who was very influential, added a resounding editorial on the same topic, entitled "Kiesinger Never Again." It was the strongest in the entire campaign.

Many reporters came to that Berlin press conference and also to the one I held in Frankfurt on August 23, and many reviews of my book appeared. There was considerable emphasis on the fact that it was a weapon for the elections, not a commercial book. And as a weapon it was effective. Heinrich Böll had written a strong preface.

August 25. My second trial began. The first point to be settled was whether Kiesinger would testify, since he was the plaintiff and it would be his last chance to reply publicly to my charges.

President Taegener ordered read to the court a letter in which Kiesinger replied to the court's summons by protesting that his electoral campaign gave him no free time. The judge concluded: "As a result, Chancellor Kiesinger, so far as we are concerned, is not present . . . ."

I noticed that the trial was taking a favorable turn, for the court did not appear aggressive – quite the countrary [sic]. My judges could not send the Chancellor's opponent in the election to prison, for that would create a scandal, and so they were going to appear generous in order to take the wind out of my sails. To guard against this, I decided not to prolong a trial that could bring me no advantage other than Kiesinger's significant absence. I therefore declared that in the absence of the Chancellor, who was discrediting himself by his cowardice, I would not answer any questions: "I am not going on with this farce. So far as I am concerned, the trial is over."
    
   
 
WHEREVER THEY MAY BE
© 1972, The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation
Previous Page  Back Page 86 Forward  Next Page

   

Last modified: April 12, 2008
Technical/administrative contact: webmaster@holocaust-history.org