the country. These articles, together with Article
48, dealing with the expenditure of money collected in taxes, and
Articles 53, 55, and 56, dealing with public property, make it clear
that under the rules of war, the economy of an occupied country can
only be required to bear the expense of the occupation, and these
should not be greater than the economy of the country can reasonably
be expected to bear. Article 56 reads as follows:
"The property of municipalities, of
religious, charitable, educational, artistic, and scientific
institutions, although belonging to the State, is to be accorded the
same standing as private property. All pre-meditated seizure,
destruction, or damage of such institutions, historical monuments,
works of art and science, is prohibited and should be
prosecuted."
The evidence in this case has established, however,
that the territories occupied by Germany were exploited for the
German war effort in the most ruthless way, without consideration of
the local economy, and in consequence of a deliberate design and
policy. There was in truth a systematic "plunder of public or
private property", which was criminal under Article 6 (b) of the
Charter. The German occupation policy was clearly stated in a speech
made by the Defendant Göring on 6 August 1942 to the various
German authorities in charge of occupied territories:
"God knows, you are not sent out
there to work for the welfare of the people in your charge, but to
get the utmost out of them, so that the German People can live. That
is what I expect of your exertions. This everlasting concern about
foreign people must cease now, once and for all. I have here before
me reports on what you are expected to deliver. It is nothing at all,
when I consider your territories. It makes no difference to me in
this connection if you say that your people will starve."
The methods employed to exploit the resources of the
occupied territories to the full varied from country to country. In
some of the occupied countries in the East and the West, this
exploitation was carried out within the framework of the existing
economic structure. The local industries were put under German
supervision, and the distribution of war materials was rigidly
controlled. The industries thought to be of value to the German war
effort were compelled to continue, and most of the rest were closed
down altogether. Raw materials and the finnished products alike were
confiscated for the needs of the German industry. As early as 19
October 1939 the Defendant Göring had issued a directive giving
detailed instructions for the administration of the occupied
territories; it provided: