15 Nov. 45
Eugene Sepp, M.D., Emeritus Professor of
Neurology, Medical Institute of Moscow; Member, Academy of Medical
Science, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Eugene Krasnushkin, M.D., Professor of
Psychiatry, Medical Institute of Moscow.
Bertram Schaffner, Major, Medical Corps,
Neuropsychiatrist, Army of the United States.
The commission has reported to the Tribunal that
it is unanimously of the opinion that Gustav Krupp von Bohlen suffers
from senile softening of the brain; that his mental condition is such
that he is incapable of understanding court procedure and of
understanding or cooperating in interrogations; that his physical
state is such that he cannot be moved without endangering his life;
and that his condition is unlikely to improve but rather will
deteriorate further.
The Tribunal accepts the findings of the medical
commission, to which exception is taken neither by the Prosecution
nor by the Defense.
Article 12 of the Charter authorizes the trial of
a defendant in absentia if found by the Tribunal to be
"necessary in the interests of justice." It is contended on
behalf of the Chief Prosecutors that in the interest of justice,
Gustav Krupp von Bohlen should be tried in absentia, despite
his physical and mental condition.
It is the decision of the Tribunal that upon the
facts presented the interests of justice do not require that Gustav
Krupp von Bohlen be tried in absentia. The Charter of the
Tribunal envisages a fair trial, in which the Chief Prosecutors may
present the evidence in support of an indictment and the defendants
may present such defense as they may believe themselves to have.
Where nature rather than flight or contumacy has rendered such a
trial impossible, it is not in accordance with justice that the case
should proceed in the absence of a defendant.
For the foregoing reasons, the Tribunal orders
that:
1. The application for postponement of the
proceedings against Gustav Krupp von Bohlen is granted.
2. The charges in the Indictment against Gustav
Krupp von Bohlen shall be retained upon the docket of the Tribunal
for trial hereafter, if the physical and mental condition of the
defendant should permit.
Further questions raised by the Chief
Prosecutors, including the question of adding another name to the
Indictment, will be considered later. The Tribunal will now hear the
application on behalf of the Defendant Streicher.
Will the Counsel state his name?