5
Dec. 45
telephone
and on his return did not revert to this
specific question. He complained,
instead, of British hostility in
general, of our political and economic
encirclement of Germany and the
activities of what he described as the
war party in England . . . .
"I
told the Field Marshal that before
speaking of British hostility, he must
understand why the undoubted change of
feeling towards Germany in England had
taken place. As he knew quite well, the
basis of all the discussions between Mr.
Chamberlain and Herr Hitler last year
had been to the effect that, once the
Sudeten were allowed to enter the Reich,
Germany would leave the Czechs alone and
would do nothing to interfere with their
independence. Herr Hitler had given a
definite assurance to that effect in his
letter to the Prime Minister of the 27th
September. By yielding to the advice of
his 'wild men' and deliberately annexing
Bohemia and Moravia, Herr Hitler had not
only broken his word to Mr. Chamberlain
but had infringed the whole principle of
self-determination on which the Munich
Agreement rested.
"At
this point, the Field Marshal
interrupted me with a description of
President Hacha's visit to Berlin. I
told Field Marshal Göring that it
was not possible to talk of free will
when I understood that he himself had
threatened to bombard Prague with his
airplanes, if Doctor Hacha refused to
sign. The Field Marshal did not deny the
fact but explained how the point had
arisen. According to him, Doctor Hacha
had from the first been prepared to sign
everything but had said that
constitutionally he could not do so
without reference first to Prague. After
considerable difficulty, telephonic
communication with Prague was obtained
and the Czech Government had agreed,
while adding that they could not
guarantee that one Czech battalion at
least would not fire on German troops.
It was, he said, only at that stage that
he had warned Doctor Hacha that, if
German lives were lost, he would bombard
Prague. The Field Marshal also repeated,
in reply to some comment of mine, the
story that the advance occupation of
Vitkovice had been effected solely in
order to forestall the Poles who, he
said, were known to have the intention
of seizing this valuable area at the
first opportunity."
I
also invite the attention of the Tribunal and
the judicial notice of the Tribunal, to Dispatch
Number 77, in the French Official Yellow
Book, at Page 96 of the book, identified as
our Document 2943-PS, appearing in the Document
Book under that number, and I ask that it be
given an identifying number, Exhibit USA-114.
This is