7 Dec.
45
That memorandum is as I have said,
dated 3rd June 1940 and relates to questions of territorial expansion
and bases:
"These
problems are pre-eminently of a political character and comprise an
abundance of questions of a political type, which it is not the Navy's
province to answer, but they also materially affect the strategic
possibilities open according to the way in which this question
is answered for the subsequent use and operation of the Navy.
"It is too well known to need further mention that
Germany's present position in the narrows of the Heligoland Bight and
in the Baltic bordered as it is by a whole series of states and
under their influence is an impossible one for the future of
Greater Germany. If over and above this one extends these strategic
possibilities to the point that Germany shall not continue to be cut
off for all time from overseas by natural geographical facts, the
demand is raised that somehow or other an end shall be put to this
state of affairs at the end of the war.
"The solution
could perhaps be found among the following possibilities:
"1)
The territories of Denmark, Norway, and northern France acquired
during the course of the war continue to be so occupied and organized
that they can in the future be considered as German possessions.
"This
solution will recommend itself for areas where the severity of the
decision tells, and should tell, on the enemy and where a gradual
germanizing of the territory appears practicable.
"2)
The taking over and holding of areas which have no direct connection
with Germany's main body and which, like the Russian solution in Hangö,
remain permanently as an enclave in the hostile state. Such areas
might be considered possible around Brest and Trondheim . . . .
"3)
The power of Greater Germany in the strategic areas acquired in this
war should result in the existing population of these areas feeling
themselves and being politically, economically, and militarily
completely dependent on Germany. If the following results are
achieved-that expansion is undertaken (on a scale I shall describe
later) by means of the military measures for occupation taken during
the war, that French powers of resistance (popular unity, mineral
resources, industry, armed forces) are so broken that a revival must
be considered out of the question, that the smaller states such as the
Netherlands, Denmark,