18 Dec. 45
geographical divisions. If Your Honor pleases, these
laws are cited, and I believe it would be cumulative evidence if we
undertook to chronicle the laws. I pass to the part at the bottom of
Page 29. There were other steps taken towards centralization. Let us see
what powers the ordinary Cabinet would wield as a result. We have here a
publication published in 1944, which was edited by Dr. Wilhelm Stuckart,
State Secretary in the Reich Ministry of the Interior, and Dr. Harry von
Rosen-von Hoewel, another official with the title of "Oberregierungsrat"
in the Reich Ministry of the Interior. It is entitled Administrative
Law, and I offer it as Document 2959-PS, Exhibit USA-399. It details
the powers and functions of all the ministers of the ordinary Cabinet,
from which I will select but a few to illustrate the extent of control
vested in the Reichsregierung. The quotation is from Page 2 of the
translation and Page 66 of the original: "The Reich Ministers.
There are at present 21 Reich Ministers, namely ... " May I say
that the only purpose in offering this is to show what each minister had
jurisdiction over and to what his authority extended; for example, the
Reich Minister for Foreign Affairs it details what he handles.
The Reich Minister of the Interior follows in detail on the matters
entrusted to his jurisdiction, and so on.
THE PRESIDENT: Colonel Storey, may I ask you what has that to do with
the criminality of the Reich Cabinet?
COL. STOREY: The point, as I see it, again though it may be cumulative,
Your Honor, is to show how these defendants, and the others with them,
formed the ministries, formed these councils, so that they could give
semblance of legality to any action they determined to take, whether
they were in session or not and according to the dictates of the
respective Ministers; in other words, showing a complete domination.
THE PRESIDENT: I should have thought that was amply shown already.
COL. STOREY: All right, Sir, I'll pass further reference. I'll skip
over all the rest of the laws and go to Page 35 of the record, in
reference to the criminality and the particular crimes. We now come to
the second phase of the proof against the Reichsregierung, tending to
establish the criminal characteristics. As the proof Of all phases of
the Prosecution's case is received, the Tribunal will note more and more
the relationship such evidence bears to the Reichsregierung and their
resultant responsibility therefor. Here we will direct the Court's
attention to some prominent elements of the evidence that brands the
group. First, it cannot be stressed too frequently that under the Nazi
regime the Reichsregierung became a criminal instrument of the Nazi
Party. In the Original Cabinet of 30 January 1933, there were only three
Cabinet members who