4 Jan. 46
Army Group H, which had retreated beyond
the Rhine. The first three paragraphs of his affidavit are
substantially identical with the first three paragraphs of Von
Blomberg's; and since they are available in all languages, for
expedition I will start reading with Paragraph 4, where the affidavit
is on a different subject:
"After the annexation of Czechoslovakia we hoped that the Polish
question would be settled in a peaceful fashion through diplomatic
means, since we believed that this time France and England would come
to the assistance of their ally. As a matter of fact, we felt that if
political negotiations came to nothing the Polish question would
unavoidably lead to war, that is, not only with Poland herself but
also with the Western Powers.
"When in the middle of June I received an order from the OKH to
prepare myself for an attack on Poland, I knew that this war came even
closer to the realm of possibility. This conclusion was only
strengthened by the Führer's speech on 22 August 1939 at the
Obersalzberg when it clearly seemed to be an actuality. Between the
middle of June 1939 and 1 September 1939 the members of my staff who
were engaged in preparations participated in various discussions which
went on between the OKH and the army group. During these discussions
such matters of a tactical, strategical, and general nature were
discussed as had to do with my future position as Commander-in-Chief
of the 8th Army during the planned Polish campaign.
"During the Polish campaign, particularly during the Kutno
operations, I was repeatedly in communication with the
Commander-in-Chief of the Army; and he, as well as the Führer
visited my headquarters. In fact, it was common practice for
commanders-in-chief of army groups and of armies to be asked from time
to time for estimates of the situation and for their recommendations
by telephone, teletype, or wireless, as well as by personal calls.
These front commanders-in-chief thus actually became advisers to the
OKH in their own field, so that the positions shown in the attached
chart embrace that group which was the actual advisory council of the
High Command of the German Armed Forces."
The Tribunal will note that the latter part of this affidavit, like
those of Halder and Brauchitsch, vouches for the accuracy. of the
structure and organization of the General Staff and High Command group
as described by the Prosecution. The Tribunal will also note that the
Von Blomberg affidavit and the first part of the Blaskowitz affidavit
make it clear beyond question that the military leaders of Germany knew
of, approved, supported, and executed plans for the