TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENT 531-PS
Source:Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression. Volume III. USGPO, Washington, 1946/pp.435-437OKW Memorandum Concerning
Enemy Commando (Parachute) Troops
23 June 1944
Armed Forces Operational Staff
Qm (Adm. 1)
No. 006688/ 44 Top Secret
Fuehrer's Hq, 23 June 1944
TOP SECRET
3 copies-1st copy
Reference: Fuehrer Order No. 003832/ 42/ OKW/ WFSt of 18 Oct 42.
Subject: Treatment of Commando Men.
Conference memorandum
Supreme Command West reports by teletype message No 1750/ 44 Top Secret of 23 June 44:
The treatment of enemy commando groups has so far been carried out according to the
order referred to. With the large-scale landing achieved, a new situation has arisen. The
order referred to directs in number 5 that enemy soldiers who are taken prisoner in open
combat or surrender within the limits or nor-mal combat operations (large-scale landing
operations and un-dertakings) are not to be treated according to numbers 3 and 4. It must
be established in a form easily understood by the troops how far the concept "within
the limits of normal combat opera-tions, etc." is to be extended. The view of the
Supreme Com-mand West is as follows:
A. The commitment of air-borne troops and commandos ef-fected in Normandy falls clearly
under number 5.
B. It is likewise not to be contested that paratroop units or groups set down
further to the rear are connected with the large scale landing operation effected, if they
have the mission of breaking supply lines or carrying out deceptive maneuvers etc. The
German combat soldier will not always be able, during bat-tle, to decide whether it is a
question of sabotage groups parachuted down or larger air-borne operations in closer or
more distant connection with a landing from the sea already carried out or still being
carried out.
C. As a result of the large turn-over of troops in the area of the Supreme Command
West, especially recently, it is possible that a considerable number of soldiers are
ignorant of the order referred to, which dates from more than 1 1/2 years ago. For Germans
from foreign countries (Volksdeutsche) and foreign nationalities the differentiation in
the treatment of prisoners will hardly be able to be made clear due to language
difficulties. A further reproduction of the order in the present situation, where cases of
losses must be considered, is held by Supreme Command West to be a false course of action.
Considerable reprisals against our own prisoners must be expected if its contents be-come
known.
D. The application of number 5 for all enemy soldiers in uniform penetrating
from the outside into the occupied western areas is held by Supreme Command West to be the
most correct and clearest solution. On the other hand an order of the chief office for
Reich security to the commander of the SIP0 (Security Police) and the SD (Security
Service) in Paris has decided that numbers 3 and 4 of the order referred to are to be
applied in the future the same as before in the case of uniformed parachutists committed
in groups. A conversation with representatives of the higher SS and police fuehrers in
France and of the commander of the SIP0 and SD in Paris gave the result that according to
the opinion of all concerned the difficulty lies in the determina-tion of the "limits
of normal combat operations". As a solu-tion it was agreed to set a line (e. g. Seine
from the mouth to Rouen-Argentan-Avranches) North of which number 5, inland of which
numbers. 3 and 4 apply. This solution also must be called incomplete, since the combat
situation can at any time bring the necessity of extending this line to other coastal
areas as well. In case of a large-scale aerial landing in the interior such boundaries
cannot be drawn anymore at all. Supreme Command West requests, therefore, that,
in agreement with the Reichsfuehrer SS, the decision be made, that, in view of the new
situation, number 5 is to be applied in the whole occupied Western area.
Position taken by Armed Forces Operational Staff:
1. The Commando order remains basically in effect even after the enemy landing in the
west.
2. Number 5 of the order is to be clarified to the effect, that the order is not valid
for those enemy soldiers in uniform, who are captured in open combat in the
immediate combat area of the beachhead by our troops committed there, or who surrender.
Our troops committed in the immediate combat area means the di-visions fighting on the
front line as well as reserves up to and including corps headquarters.
3. Furthermore, in doubtful cases enemy personnel who have fallen into our hands alive
are to be turned over to the SD, upon whom it is encumbent to determine whether the
commando order is to be applied or not.
4. Supreme Command West is to see to it that all units com-mitted in its zone are
orally acquainted in a suitable manner with the order concerning the treatment of members
of com-mando undertakings of 18 Oct 42 along with the above explana-tion.
Proposal : Attached teletype message.
signed : WARLIMONT
Distribution : Chief of the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces-l copy through Deputy
Commander of the Armed Forces Operational Staff.
Ktb, 2 copies.
Qu-Draft, 3 copies. |