Copyright © 1999, H-Net
Pamela Rotner Sakamoto. Japanese
Diplomats and Jewish Refugees: A World War II Dilemma. Westport,
Conn.: Praeger, 1998. xvi + 189 pp. Bibliographical references and index.
$39.95 (cloth), ISBN 0-275-96199-0.
Reviewed by Joshua A. Fogel, As my title indicates, at long last we have a study of a phenomenon
long talked about, long speculated about, and only now for the first time
in English actually studied. Numerous writers and speakers have
pontificated about the now legendary Sugihara Chiune and the role of
Japanese diplomacy in saving thousands of Jewish lives on the eve of the
Holocaust, but with the publication of this book by Pamela Rotner Sakamoto
and that of Hillel Levine's In Search of Sugihara (The Free
Press, 1996), we now have two solid studies of this important topic.
The real strength of Sakamoto's work is that she has done what no other
Western scholar has done. She has pored over the many documents in the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs archives to track down the role played by
Japanese diplomats in Central and Eastern Europe (as well as in Tokyo) in
confronting the issue of numerous Jews seeking refuge away from the coming
cataclysm. In addition she has worked in numerous archives in the United
States as well, and then attempted to put the whole story back together
like an immensely complicated jigsaw puzzle.
If I were to cite any fault with this study, it would be that, as a
work of history, it is still too close to the documents. Indeed, the
diplomatic correspondence is what enlivens and makes it all work, but more
context both in Japan and in Europe would help the unitiated reader a
great deal. It is not absent here-we would just like more. As a work in
the narrower field of diplomatic history, though, this work is no more or
less at fault than many others.
Sakamoto's finest achievement is, on the one hand, to explain the
extraordinarily complex process by which Jews in, especially, Lithuania
came upon Japan as a country whose transit visa could save them-usually
with an entry visa from elsewhere; and, on the other, how Sugihara found
himself in a position to issue over 2000 such visas. Where Levine got
closer than anyone has thus far toward explaining who Sugihara really was,
Sakamoto places him in the labyrinthine maze of the prewar Japanese
Foreign Office bureaucracy.
One of the earlier sections of her book deals with the background of
anti-Semitism in Japan. This chapter could have used some more nuance.
There is, for example, no mention of the notorious anti-Semite Shioden
Nobutaka (a.k.a. Fujiwara Nobutaka) who wrote voluminously and viciously
on the evils of the Jews to Japan; a multilingual scholar, he also
translated the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (from Russian)
and Mein Kampf (from German) into Japanese, and he worked to
see their arguments disseminated. Nor is there any mention of General
Higuchi Kiichiro who is often credited with saving thousands of Jewish
lives by allowing them to enter Manzhouguo (Manchukuo) without their
papers completely in order. In mentioning the omnipresent Dr. Abraham
Kaufman, leader of the Harbin Jewish community, she notes that
"Kaufman was respected by all who met him" (p. 18). Clearly,
this is an exaggeration, for Kaufman spent over a decade in the Soviet
Gulag after World War II, apparently having failed to earn the
"respect" of the Red Army.
Somewhat earlier, though, Sakamoto raises a telling enigma:
"Although Japan persecuted other Asians, Jews were Caucasians who
were treated differently." Raising this issue is important enough,
but unfortunately she never asks why this would have been the case. Why,
for instance, did the Japanese military so miserably abuse the Chinese and
Koreans (and other Asians), who were their putative allies according to
their own propaganda, while saving so many Jewish lives, people who were
marked for extermination by their Nazi allies or who sometimes even
carried passports of enemy states? Of course, the Japanese mistreated
enemy Caucasian POWs, but many thousands survived, whereas the Japanese
military left brutality and murder wherever it went on Asian terrain.
In short, this is a welcome addition to our unfolding understanding of
Japanese wartime behavior. It uses the Japanese diplomatic archives to the
fullest extent to this point. A fuller accounting of Japanese-Jewish
relations would have to use materials in Chinese, Russian, Yiddish,
German, and perhaps Hebrew as well. We await future scholarship in these
areas. One note on the index to the book: it is extremely uneven. Many
names in the text are not in it, and many references in the text to names
that are in the index are not given. |