Copyright © 1996, H-Net, all rights reserved. This work may be copied
for non-profit educational use if proper credit is given to the author and the list.
Doris L. Bergen. Twisted Cross: The German Christian Movement in the
Third Reich. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press, 1996.
Cloth $39.95 ISBN 0-8078-2253-1; Paper $16.95 ISBN 0-8078-4560-4. Published by H-German
27 September 1996
The German Christians were a relatively small but highly disruptive element within
German Protestantism which pursued the goal of harmonizing Christianity (or what they
understood Christianity to be) with National Socialism. Their project was to
"arianise" both Holy Scripture and the person of Jesus Christ; in short, to rid
traditional Christianity of all putatively Jewish components. The German Christians were
thus committed to a cult of the Volk, to the idea of racial purity and to adulation
of the Führer. All these things, so they argued, were inherent in the being of the
true unadulterated Germanic people. Their religious practice consisted in preaching a
manly, anti-effeminate, essentially Germanic gospel, and the singing of patriotic songs
and hymns of praise to the Fuehrer who was equated with the Saviour. It was a movement
without serious theology, which refused to countenance any intellectual debate or dogma.
Its only binding principle was a sentimental feeling of belonging together.
There are many reasons to welcome Doris Bergen's diligently researched and clearly
written investigation of this curious movement. First, it shows that even in the country
where theological studies had been developed to their most sophisticated level, there
could emerge a totally unscientific, irrational and essentially anti-Christian movement
which claimed that there was no essential difference between National Socialism and the
Gospel of Christ. This raises the problem of how academic theology is received at the
grass roots, indeed, how people, including pastors, appropriate "twisted" ideas,
regard them as normative, and actually base their lives on them.
Secondly, the study is important because it contributes to the discussion about the
essential character of National Socialism itself as a religion of nature (see Robert Pois,
National Socialism and the Religion of Nature, London: Croom Helm, 1986). Here
Bergen shows how close the German Christians were to the Nazis, and at the same time how
far they were from comprehending the Nazis' real agenda with regard to Christianity. The
project of bringing the two into alignment was naive and harebrained, but the mystery is
that so many people thought it could be done. Thus the book helps us better to understand
the religious dimension of National Socialism and that era in Germany.
Thirdly, Bergen underlines how basic to nationalism religion can be. Her book may be
profitably read in conjunction with Many Are Chosen: Divine Election & Western
Nationalism edited by William R. Hutchison and Hartmut Lehmann (Minneapolis: Fortress
Press, 1994). Lehmann's chapter on Germany, "'God Our Old Ally': The Chosen People
Theme in Late Nineteenth- and early Twentieth-Century Nationalism," reveals the roots
of the German Christians' central idea, namely that the Germans, by virtue of their
historical experience, having rescued true Christianity at the time of the Reformation,
and by their supposed purity of blood and sheer cultural superiority, were destined to
establish the Kingdom of God on earth.
Bergen shows that several strands in German intellectual history were bound together in
the German Christian movement. It is comprehensible as a product of popular piety (Volksfrömmigkeit)
in German Protestantism, amalgamated with the völkisch movement of the nineteenth
century which saw in blood and race the main forces of history. But what also contributed
were the German schools of scientific theology. The so-called liberal school associated
with Adolf von Harnack, which argued in Hegelian categories that the will of the State was
virtually in accordance with the will of Almighty God, created a climate of thought that
led to an apotheosis of the German State. Certainly under these conditions, theology could
never become an instrument of political criticism. This was reinforced by the Ordnungstheologen
who in the 1920s designated the Volk as a God-given factor, i.e. an
"order" in Creation, which had a divine right to realize itself as an essential
part of Heilsgeschichte, the history of salvation. Thus race was prioritized over
those apparently "color blind" and racially inclusive sections of the New
Testament which, in the Western liberal mind, make Christianity a source for cosmopolitan
values. Bergen, of course, refers to this, but it is an aspect of the origins of the
German Christians that could have perhaps been fleshed out more. German scientific
theology reflected the self-perception of German society; alternatively it was an
expression of the Zeitgeist.
That said, it is valuable to have this case study of an extreme form of religious
bigotry which is by no means unique in the world today. People still tend to believe what
they want to believe and to marginalize, de-humanize and even exterminate those who do not
conform to their version of how the world should be constituted. From today's Western
perspective the German Christians are a grotesque curiosity. But it is sobering to be
reminded that very little separated them from the more conservative elements in the
Confessing Church. In many cases the latter supported the Nazis' foreign and domestic
policies with the great exception being the Aryan paragraphs of the Civil Service law of
April 1933, which required the dismissal of pastors of Jewish extraction. This unleashed
considerable debate because the old Lutheran doctrine of the two kingdoms was invoked
which denied the State the right to interfere in the Church's competence to order its own
affairs. If the Church baptized Jews and even ordained them to the pastorate, that was its
business. Seen in retrospect, it was the key factor in the resistance that was mounted by
the Confessing Church led by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Karl Barth and Martin Niemoeller. And
here Bergen's work reminds us to maintain a differentiated assessment of the actual role
of the Confessing Church in the Third Reich. Not all adherents, by any means, endorsed the
theology or actions of a Bonhoeffer who struggled against the odds to make his Church free
of anti-Semitism and to become enthusiastically ecumenical and pacifist.
Finally, Bergen's book is important because it illustrates the paradox between those
who could still prioritise the mythic claims of the national community and thereby justify
all manner of injustice and the violation of human rights, and those like Dietrich
Bonhoeffer. He emerged from the same Lutheran tradition, yet was able, out of that
tradition, to become a martyr for human rights. In that Bergen lays bare the bizarre
racism, crass anti-intellectualism, the blatant sexism and brutal sentimentality of the
German Christian movement and demonstrates the extraordinary difficulty of providing a
rational explanation for human behavior. That not a few German Christians found their way
back into the German Protestant Church after 1945 as though nothing had happened is a
chilling thought.
John A. Moses, Australian National University, Canberra
|