|   |  
				    
				   
					 | Afterword  |  
				    
				   
					 |   |  
				   
				  
					 
  | 
				   
				  
					 |   | 
				   
				  
					 |   | 
				   
				  
					 | Bearing Witness | 
				   
				  
					 |   | 
				   
				  
					 |   | 
				   
				  
					 
						
						  
							 |   | 
							  The story is not ended, it has not yet become history, and the
								secret life it holds can break out tomorrow in you or in me | 
							   | 
						   
						  
							 |   | 
							  GERSHOM SCHOLEM | 
							   | 
						   
						  
							 |   | 
							   | 
							   | 
						   
						  | 
				   
				  
					 |   | 
				   
				  
					 I complete this book with many different feelings: relief
						at the idea of Nazi doctors no longer inhabiting my study, uneasiness
						concerning the limitations of my work, anger toward Nazi killers in general and
						Nazi doctors in particular, and a certain satisfaction that I have seen the
						effort through. My mind darts back and forth between the sitting rooms in which
						I talked to former Nazi doctors and images of Jews lined up for selections at
						Auschwitz and mental patients being gassed at killing centers. From the
						beginning I have been on guard against letting the sitting rooms block out the
						victims. 
  Yet it was in those sitting rooms that I did a great part of
						the research, and did it in a way that required me to view medical
						perpetrators, whatever their relationship to evil, as human beings and nothing
						else. That meant requiring of myself a form of empathy for Nazi doctors: I had
						to imagine my way into their situation, not to exonerate but to seek knowledge
						of human susceptibility to evil. The logic of my position was clear enough:
						only a measure of empathy, however reservedly offered, could help one grasp the
						psychological components of the anti-empathic evil in which many of these Nazi
						doctors had engaged. 
  Yet whatever its logic, it felt strange and
						uncomfortable to hold out even minimal empathy (and even with full awareness of
						the clear distinction between empathy and sympathy) for participants in a
						project so murderous, and one aimed specifically at my own people, at me. If I
						never fully resolved the matter, I managed it by understanding my empathy to be
						in the service of a critical rendition of those doctors' psychological actions
						and experiences. One sometimes enters into anothers situation not to help
						but to expose and evaluate motivations and behavior. 
  Even then, one is
						making human contact, avoiding what Erik Erikson   | 
				    
				  |