| . |
Alfried Krupp. Immediately upon service of the
Indictment, learning the serious condition of Krupp von Bohlen, the
United States again called a meeting of Prosecutors and proposed an
amendment to include Alfried Krupp. Again the proposal of the United
States was defeated by a vote of 3 to 1. If now the Tribunal shall
exercise its discretion to excuse from trial the one indicted member of
the Krupp family, one of the chief purposes of the United States will be
defeated and it is submitted that such a result is not "in the
interests of justice."
The United States respectfully submits that no greater disservice to the
future peace of the world could be done than to excuse the entire Krupp
family and the armament enterprise from this Trial in which aggresive
<sic> war making is sought to be
condemned. The "interests of justice" cannot be determined
without taking into account justice to the men of four generations whose
lives have been taken or menaced by Krupp munitions and Krupp armament,
and those of the future who can feel no safety if such persons as this
escape all condemnation in proceedings such as this.
While of course the United States cannot, without the concurrence of one
other Power indict a new defendant, it can under the Charter alone
oppose this motion. The United States respectfully urges that if the
favor now sought by Krupp von Bohlen is to be granted, it be upon the
condition that Alfried Krupp be substituted or added as a defendant so
that there may be a representative of the Krupp interests before the
Tribunal.
It may be suggested that bringing in a new defendant would result in
delay. Admitting, however, that a delay which cannot exceed a few days
may be occasioned, it is respectfully suggested that the precise day
that this Trial will start is a less important consideration than
whether it is to fail of one of its principal purposes. The American
Prosecution staff has been by long odds the longest and farthest away
from home in this endeavor. On personal as well as public interest
consideration it deplores delay. But we think the future as well as the
contemporary world cannot fail to be shocked if, in a trial in which it
is sought to condemn aggressive war making, the Krupp industrial empire
is completely saved from condemnation.
The complete trial brief of the United States on Krupp von Bohlen with
copies of the documents on which his culpability is asserted will be
made available to the Tribunal if it is desired as evidence concerning
him and Alfried Krupp and the Krupp concerns.
Respectfully submitted:
/ s / ROBERT H. JACKSON
Chief of Counsel for the
United States of America
12 November 1945
138 |