| . |
a vast organisation. There are, therefore,
many sources within the Krupp firm from which the defending Advocate
can obtain information which will enable him to deal with the
allegations contained in the American Answer. If the Defendant Gustav
Krupp is not retained in the list of defendants, there will be no
advocate so well qualified to deal with those allegations on behalf of
the other defendants, against whom they will still be preferred. In
the circumstances of this trial the kernel of the case for the
prosecution is that a number of conspirators have agreed and worked
together for the purpose of waging aggressive war and causing untold
misery to the World. The public interest, that the defendant who is
responsible for the preparation of armaments on the one hand, and the
utilisation on arms production, of prisoners of war and forced labour,
including detainees from Concentration Camps on the other, is one of "the
interests of justice" within Article 12 of the Charter. vii)
Finally, it is earnestly desired that the wishes of the Tribunal as
publicly announced at Berlin on the 18th October that the trial should
open on the appointed day, namely, 20th November be realised and
carried into execution. The British Delegation is strongly opposed to
any postponement.
/ s / HARTLEY SHAWCROSS
British Chief Prosecutor
140 |