NMT01-T023
Volume I · Page 23
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: I was just asking for information whether they had received copies of the motion.
MR. McHANEY: That I don't know. Yes, the counsel for these defendants say "Yes".
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: Does counsel for defendant Blome raise any objection to the amendment of the indictment?
DR. SAUTER: No.
DR. KAUFFMANN: Kauffmann for Rudolf Brandt. I have no objection to the change.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: You represent Rudolf Brandt?
DR. KAUFFMANN: Yes.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: Well, the other defendant affected is defendant Blome, I understand. Is he, represented here?
DR. SAUTER: Dr. Sauter for the defendant Blome. We don't have any objection.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: The indictment will be amended in accordance with the motion.
Is it agreeable to counsel for these two defendants that the arraignment as to them upon this count which has just been amended be considered as pleas to the count as amended now — their pleas of "Not Guilty"?
DR. SAUTER: Yes.
KAUFFMANN: Yes.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: These matters will appear in the records of the Tribunal. The pleas of the defendants will all be entered in the minutes of the Tribunal.
