| . |
should be used as will be put at the disposal by
Reichsfuehrer SS." (NO-177, Pros. Ex. 133.)
Thus, with full knowledge that the use of Berkatit for periods
of 6 days would result in permanent injuries to the experimental subjects and
that death would result no later than the 12th day, plans were made to conduct
experiments of 6 and 12 days' duration. It should be voted that the
conference report does not state that the duration was a maximum of 12 days as
in the case of the first series of experiment. The duration was to be 12
days in any event. Since it was known that volunteers could not be expected
under such conditions, the conference determined to use inmates of
concentration camps which would be put at their disposal by the SS. At a second
meeting on 20 May 1944, the report states that "it was decided that Dachau
was to be the place where the experiments were (to be) conducted."
(NO-177, Pros. Ex. 133.) Copies of the report on the conferences were
sent, among others, to the Medical Experimentation and Instruction Division of
the Air Force, Jueterbog, to which the defendants, Schaefer and Holzloehner,
who conducted the freezing experiments with Rascher, were attached; to the
German Aviation Research Institute, Berlin-Adlershof, to which the defendants
Ruff and Romberg were attached; to the Medical Inspectorate of the Luftwaffe
(L. In. 14) ; and to the Reich Leader SS. The report was signed by Christensen
of the Technical Office of the Reich Air Ministry.
On 7 June 1944 the defendant Schroeder wrote to Himmler through Grawitz asking
for concentration camp inmates to be used as subjects in the sea-water
experiments. This letter reads in part as follows: "Earlier already you made it possible for the Luftwaffe to
settle urgent medical matters through experiments on human beings. Today
again I stand before a decision which, after numerous experiments on
animals as well as human experiments on voluntary experimental subjects,
demands a final solution, The Luftwaffe has simultaneously developed two
methods for making sea water potable. The one method, developed by a medical
officer, removes the salt from the sea water and transforms it into real
drinking water; the second method, suggested by an engineer, leaves the salt
content unchanged, and only removes the unpleasant taste from the sea water.
The latter method, in contrast to the first, requires no critical raw material.
From the medical point of view this method must be viewed critically, as the
administration of concentrated salt solutions can produce severe symptoms of
poisoning. "As the experiments on human
beings could thus far only be carried out for a period of 4 days, and as
practical demands require
420
|