| |
with lead, the other tissues of the body will be
injured, and radiologic malaise, the so-called 'Roentgenkater,' will
ensue."
Witness, would you define your attitude toward this letter
which I partly read?
A. I was speaking in connection with the talk I had with Himmler in the year of
1941. This becomes apparent from the paragraph "I herewith submit the
result of an X-ray examination." It looks now as though in effect
experiments had been carried out by scientists, which was not the case. Himmler
had to be reassured and that is why we had to emphasize that the experiments
had been concluded and the result could be based on scientific work. Of course,
we couldn't state the result as being absolutely positive. We had to leave it
to Himmler himself to judge it. In the first instance it was our intention to
get Himmler off the idea. That is why we chose the formulation which can be
seen in that letter "If any persons are to be sterilized
permanently." It meant in effect that this was theoretically possible. At
the same time, however, we pointed out that this success cannot be concealed
and that phenomena will arise. That obviously was shown by the contents of the
certificate itself, and it is emphasized that permanent sterilization makes a
high dosage of X-rays necessary. These high dosages would then bring about the
effects of castration with all of the accompanying symptoms which would be
noticed immediately. If, however, lower dosages were used, you would only have
stopped procreative capacity for a short time. We actually said that at the end
of the report, namely, that the result of sterilization could be ascertained
after a comparatively short time but that it was impossible to achieve the
results of bringing about sterilization without being noticed, and in this way
we thought we could get Himmler to give up that idea.
Q. Now, this was the first part of the letter. Now, let us discus the second
part. I am again referring to the method which you suggested to Himmler. You
thought at that time "One practical way of proceeding would be, for
instance, to let the persons to be treated approach a counter, where they could
be asked to answer some questions or to fill in forms, which take them 2 or 3
minutes. The official sitting behind the counter could operate the installation
in such a way as to turn a switch which would activate the two valves
simultaneously (since the irradiation is to operate from both sides). With a
two-valve installation about 150-200 persons could then be sterilized per day
and, therefore, with 20 such installations as many as 3,000-4,000 persons per
day. In my estimation a larger daily number could not in any case be sent away
for this purpose."
Herr Brack, how could you arrive at this idea of turning switches? This is
completely nonunderstandable for a layman
736
|