[preserva...] tion of his economic existence and who can
confirm from his own experience that Blome was never one of the fanatical and
ruthless types of the Hitler regime. Dr. Strakosch confirmed that Blome always
intended to act as a mitigating influence and that Blome was purely an idealist
and not an opportunist in his political convictions.
C. Responsibility
of Subordinates for Acts Carried Out Under Superior Orders
a.
Introduction
Article 114 (b) of Control Council
Law No. 10 states that "The fact that any person acted pursuant to the
order of his government or of a superior does not free him from responsibility
for a crime, belt may be considered in mitigation." The defendants argued,
however, that superior orders freed them from criminal responsibility entirely.
They also argued that superior orders to engage in the conduct alleged as
criminal constitute a mitigating circumstance.
Extracts from the closing statement
of the prosecution on the same point appears on pages 957 to 958. A summation
of the evidence on this point by the defense has been taken front the final
pleas on behalf of the defendants Brack and Fischer. It appears below on pages
959 to 970. This argumentation is followed by two sections from the testimony
of defendants on pages 970 to 974, extracts from the examination of defendant
Karl Brandt by Judge Sebring, and an extract from the cross-examination of
defendant Rose.
b. Selection from
the Argumentation of the Prosecution
EXTRACTS FROM THE
CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION ¹
* * * * * * * * *
*
The defense of Handloser is a
general denial. He says in effect that: I was a soldier. I was in charge of the
medical administration of the Wehrmacht, but had no power and no right to issue
orders, and that whatever may have happened, I am not responsible for it. It is
interesting to note that this defense is very similar to that put forward by
Field Marshal Keitel ² in this courtroom approximately a year ago. He was
represented by the same defense counsel. Keitel also said that he could not
issue orders. We have already discussed in some detail the position of
Handloser, and it has been established beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was
the supreme authority in the
_______________
¹.Closing statement is recorded in mimeographed
transcript, 14 July 1947, Pp. 10718-10796.
².Defendant before International Military Tribunal. See Trial of the Major
War Criminals, Vols.I-XLII, Nuremberg, 1947.
957
|