Image ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT01-T957


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume I · Page 957
Previous Page Home PageArchive
 

[preserva...] tion of his economic existence and who can confirm from his own experience that Blome was never one of the fanatical and ruthless types of the Hitler regime. Dr. Strakosch confirmed that Blome always intended to act as a mitigating influence and that Blome was purely an idealist and not an opportunist in his political convictions.

C. Responsibility of Subordinates for Acts Carried Out Under Superior Orders

a. Introduction

Article 114 (b) of Control Council Law No. 10 states that "The fact that any person acted pursuant to the order of his government or of a superior does not free him from responsibility for a crime, belt may be considered in mitigation." The defendants argued, however, that superior orders freed them from criminal responsibility entirely. They also argued that superior orders to engage in the conduct alleged as criminal constitute a mitigating circumstance.

Extracts from the closing statement of the prosecution on the same point appears on pages 957 to 958. A summation of the evidence on this point by the defense has been taken front the final pleas on behalf of the defendants Brack and Fischer. It appears below on pages 959 to 970. This argumentation is followed by two sections from the testimony of defendants on pages 970 to 974, extracts from the examination of defendant Karl Brandt by Judge Sebring, and an extract from the cross-examination of defendant Rose.

b. Selection from the Argumentation of the Prosecution

EXTRACTS FROM THE CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE PROSECUTION ¹

* * * * * * * * * *

The defense of Handloser is a general denial. He says in effect that: I was a soldier. I was in charge of the medical administration of the Wehrmacht, but had no power and no right to issue orders, and that whatever may have happened, I am not responsible for it. It is interesting to note that this defense is very similar to that put forward by Field Marshal Keitel ² in this courtroom approximately a year ago. He was represented by the same defense counsel. Keitel also said that he could not issue orders. We have already discussed in some detail the position of Handloser, and it has been established beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was the supreme authority in the

_______________

¹.Closing statement is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 14 July 1947, Pp. 10718-10796.
².Defendant before International Military Tribunal. See Trial of the Major War Criminals, Vols.I-XLII, Nuremberg, 1947.


957
Next Page NMT Home Page