| |
A. Between the collective idea and the state order on the one
hand and the medical individual on the other, there stands something rather
important the human conscience.
* * * * * * * * * *
Q. Professor, if all these experiments were actually conducted, and also as you
said this morning and as Moll's book shows, Moll alone published approximately
six hundred works about thousands of such experiments (on human beings), must
one not say that wide circles of medical men judge the question of experiments
on human beings under certain conditions differently from you from an
ethical point of view?
A. That I cannot say, because even Moll writes at the end of this work that it
is part of a physician's morals to restrain his urge for natural research in
favor of the basic medical attitude as laid down in the oath of Hippocrates,
namely, to cause no arbitrary harm to his patient.
Q. But in your opinion, Professor, how should a doctor work in the interest of
suffering humanity in cases where, as you have just said, there is no
possibility of experiments on animals?
A. The concept of humanity is a very dangerous concept. It is most dangerous of
all for the physician. For the physician, the individual stands above all
humanity and the individual unfortunately has sunk very low in these last few
years.
Q. I believe that you have not quite answered my question. I asked: How do you
think the doctor should solve certain questions even in the interest of the
individual questions which cannot be tested with animal experiments and
test tubes, as is the case with malaria for instance. This is a problem which
must be cleared up if he is to help his suffering patients.
A. That is naturally a very difficult question. But in the end the main thing
will always be that a risk must have certain limits.
Q. Thank you. Now I come to another point. This morning, Professor, you
expressed disapproval about a book which the defendant Mrugowsky wrote on
medical ethics. May I ask, have you read this book?
A. Yes.
Q. Do You know Mrugowsky personally?
A. No.
Q. Then you do not know his ethical point of view?
A. I said that it was quite an ironical joke of world history for someone to
quote the high medical ethics of Hufeland in the form of excerpts from his
writings, as far as I remember, with a few connecting words and to combine
these quotations in a modest
81
|