| |
rules of war, but a criminal medical experiment wherein wounds were
inflicted on prisoners with the sole end in view of determining the
effectiveness of poisoned bullets as a means of taking life. The hapless
victims of this dastardly torture were Russian prisoners of war, entitled to
the protection afforded by the laws of civilized nations. As has been said, in
substance, in this judgment: While under certain specific conditions the rules
of land warfare may recognize the validity of an execution by shooting, it will
not under any circumstances countenance the infliction of death by maiming or
torture.
SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS
That Mrugowsky rendered
assistance to Gebhardt in the sulfanilamide experiments at Ravensbrueck is
plainly shown by the record. Mrugowsky put his laboratory and co-workers at
Gebhardt's disposal. He furnished the cultures for the infections. It was on
the suggestion of Mrugowsky's office that wood shavings and ground glass were
placed in the wounds of the subjects so that battlefield wounds would be more
closely simulated.
GAS OEDEMA EXPERIMENTS
Toward the end of 1942 a conference was
held in the Military Medical Academy, Berlin, to discuss the effects of gas
oedema serum on wounded persons. During the conference, several cases were
reported in which wounded soldiers who had received gas oedema serum injections
in large quantities suddenly died without apparent reason. Mrugowsky, who
participated in the conference, expressed the possibility that perhaps the
deaths had been due to the phenol content of the serum. As a step toward
solving the problem Mrugowsky ordered Dr. Ding-Schuler, his subordinate, to
take part in a euthanasia killing with phenol and to report on the results in
detail.
In pursuance of the order given, Dr. Ding and the defendant
Hoven killed some of the concentration camp inmates at Buchenwald with phenol
injections and Ding reported his findings to his superior officer, Mrugowsky,
as required by the order.
FREEZING. INCENDIARY BOMB, AND EPIDEMIC
JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS
As to these items the Tribunal is of the view
that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the charges.
It has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant
Mrugowsky was a principal in, accessory to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting
part in, and was knowingly connected with
247 |