| |
Tribunal has not given me permission to furnish complete proof for
this fact); he, Erhard Milch, truly never tried to enslave the world. If he had
succeeded in his plans in 1937, then there would have been no 1938. And, all
the more, there would not have been the horrible period of 1939 to 1945, the
period in which the battle against intolerance became so hard and so
complicated that we might think today that, as in an Arabian tale this spirit
of intolerance freed itself from the bottle and spread itself over so wide an
area that, even today, it causes actions which one day must also be condemned
by the just and the wise.
I shall prove that from the moment when this
man tried, in 1937, to achieve his plans for peace he lost the confidence of
his superiors. He never belonged to the intimate circle in which his superiors
confided, even less so after 1937. They employed him unwillingly and only
because they believed that they could not spare him because of his ability. It
is cheap and easy to say now that this man should have denied his superiors the
benefit of his talents. We shall prove that he tried to do so. But who can dare
to judge with certainty what went on in the heart of such a man who was
terribly aware of what dangers threatened his people, once the fateful step of
starting the war had been taken? Neither did he want this step nor could he
prevent it.
Should he really have chosen the path of revolt, this man
who was brought up in a world in which, for all ages, military obedience had
been an inviolate law, this man who had a passionate love for his people? How
many human beings in any country are capable of breaking the chains of their
education, and turn against the laws which have been inviolate for them ever
since their childhood?
There is no punishable guilt, perhaps even no
moral guilt in the fact that a man cannot free himself from the world of his
education. Because it is the very essence of all education to give the man
unbreakable laws and to create around him what philosophers call "the
environment proper to his own nature." Therefore, he has not made himself
guilty by doing what his education and the conceptions of his environment made
him call his duty, in a war which he did not want, which he tried to prevent;
and the stopping of which he advised again and again after it had started. This
duty, he felt, was to do his work and to prevent the worst which he
anticipated, namely, the terrible devastation of his fatherland and its
complete and helpless collapse.
I shall prove that he always, even
after the war had broken out, concerned himself with questions of defense only;
that he wanted to strengthen the fighter force, a defensive weapon with
378 |