| |
VII. JUDGMENT
A. Opinion and Judgment of the United
States Military Tribunal II* The
indictment in this case contains three counts, which may be summarized as
follows
Count One: War crimes, involving murder, slave labor,
deportation of civilian population for slave labor, cruel and inhuman treatment
of foreign laborers, and the use of prisoners of war in war operations by force
and compulsion.
Count Two: War crimes, involving murder,
subjecting involuntary victims to low-pressure and freezing experiments
resulting in torture and death.
Count Three: Crimes against
humanity, involving murder and the same unlawful acts specified in counts one
and two against German nationals and nationals of other countries.
For
reasons of its own, the Tribunal will first consider counts two and one, in
that order, followed by consideration of count three.
COUNT TWO
More in detail, this count alleges that the defendant was a principal in,
accessory to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting part in and was connected
with, plans and enterprises involving medical experiments without the subjects'
consent, in the course of which experiments, the defendant, with others,
perpetrated murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, and other inhuman acts.
The so-called medical experiments consisted of placing the subject in an
airtight chamber in which the air pressure is mechanically reduced so that it
is comparable with the pressure to which an aviator is subjected at high
altitudes, and in experimenting upon the effect of extreme dry and wet cold
upon the human body. For these experiments inmates of the concentration camp at
Dachau were selected. These inmates presented a motley group of prisoners of
war, dissenters from the philosophy of the National Socialist Party, Jews, both
from Germany and the eastern countries, rebellious or indifferent factory
workers, displaced civilians from eastern occupied countries, and an undefined
group known as "asocial or undesirable persons."
__________ Concurring opinions were filed by
Judge Musmanno, see pp. 797-859, and by Judge Phillips, see pp. 860-878.
773 |