| |
12.
Retrospectiveness of penal laws and legal analogy Dr. Aschenauer and Dr.
Schilf. 13.
Types of perpetrators Dr. Schubert.
14.
Military penal law Dr. Koessl.
15. Independence of judges and
directive measures Dr. Aschenauer and Dr. Schilf.
16. Law of
pardon myself.
17. Execution of sentence Dr. Marx.
18. Lynch law Dr. Orth.
19. Sterilization and Euthanasia
Dr. Orth and myself.
20. Conspiracy and Control Council Law No.
10 Dr. Haensel, Dr. Doetzer, and Dr. Wandschneider.
May I now
begin making my statement for the defendant Schlegelberger?
PRESIDING
JUDGE BRAN: Do you have that in the translated form for us? We have it, thank
you.
C. Opening Statement for the Defendant
Schlegelberger¹ DR. KUBUSCHOK: If, in
my statement concerning the defense in general² as I have just pointed out
that the administration of justice in the National Socialist State cannot be
judged separately but must be judged in the light of the whole administration
of the Reich and its head, the dictatorship, I shall have to refer thus in
defending the defendant Schlegelberger again and again to his personality,
quite apart from dealing with the objective facts as propounded by the
prosecution in order to judge and interpret actions in their proper light.
Franz Schlegelberger was, after many years of service to both the
administration of justice and the jurisprudence, already Under Secretary when
Hitler came to power. He kept this position until August 1942 when Hitler,
according to his pronouncements wanted to build up a National Socialist
administration of justice. Schlegelberger had always been dealing with civil
law. We will outline this, his activity, in general. When in January 1941 after
the death of the Minister of Justice Gaertner, he took over the administration
of the Ministry of Justice as the then oldest Under Secretary according to
rank, so to speak; only then did he, in this
__________
¹ Tr. pp. 4084-4089. ² The general opening
statement on behalf of all defendants is reproduced immediately above, section.
III B.
126 |