| |
people were entangled into error, misery, and guilt, should he not
feel even more that he is one of them, and should he not try to gain that which
cannot be lost-self-reflection, principles, and dignity. The defense wishes to
thank the Tribunal for having given it full opportunity to represent the
interests of its client in this spirit during this trial.
II. Criminal facts of the case according
to the indictment; conspiracy and the individual facts of the case concerning
war crimes and crimes against humanity
Dr. Rothenberger is charged with the crime of conspiracy, committing war crimes
and crimes against humanity. According to the prosecution, the same concrete
facts form the basis for the last two charges. In like manner, the charge of
conspiracy is connected with the planning of the afore-mentioned war crimes and
crimes against humanity. The facts presented by the prosecution to prove these
crimes are in accordance with the IMT judgment only relevant from the penal
point of view since the beginning of the war. We are concerned with the
following facts:
Numbers 9 and 21 of the indictment Use
of the Special Courts and the People's Courts for the oppression of political
enemies.
Numbers 10 and 22 of the indictment
Participation in the discussion between Himmler and Thierack of 18 September
1992. Numbers
11 and 28 of the indictment Sentencing and
execution of Germans and non-Germans for high treason.
Numbers 14
and 26 of the indictment 11 legal execution.
Numbers 16
and 28 of the indictment Preferential treatment shown Party members
who are to be punished and collaboration in the introduction of the special
penal law for Jews and others.
III. Nonexistence of a conspiracy on legal
grounds Before starting to discuss the
basis for the above charges in the indictment, it seems fitting to treat
briefly the question of conspiracy, From a legal standpoint, attention must be
called to the fact that according to the statute of the London Treaty, as well
as the Control Council Law No. 10, the conspiracy, or plan, can only be
considered as a crime in itself if it concerns a crime against peace but not if
it concerns a war crime or Crime against humanity. This viewpoint was
maintained also by the IMT in trial No. I.
143 |