|
Mass Killings for
Ideological Reasons |
|
Dr. Reinhard Maurach, Professor Criminal Law
and Eastern European Law, was called by the defendant Ohlendorf to expound the
international law underlying the position of the various defendants maintaining
Ohlendorf's view. Some sections of his treatise, submitted as Ohlendorf
Document 38, supported the prosecution rather than the defense. On three
occasions he condemned mass killings for ideological reasons. |
|
"This is the place to say with
special emphasis that the shooting of entire groups of a population is not
justified by any 'collective suspicion', of any group, no matter how great.
"It has already been emphasized that the issuing and execution of mass
liquidation orders cannot find any justification in international law, even
within the scope of a total war of this kind, and in particular cannot allow of
any appeal to the objective premises of self-defense and emergency.
"General extermination measures cannot be justified by any war
situations, no matter how exceptional." |
However, in the end the expert arrived at an
opposite conclusion. First, he stated that a state of war as such does
not vindicate extraordinary actions, but then in a superb demonstration of
legal acrobatics he declared that if the war aims of one of the opponents are
total, then the opponent is vindicated in claiming self-defense and state of
necessity, and, therefore, may introduce the mass killings he had previously
condemned.
For the purpose of considering this argument we will ignore
the fact that Germany waged an undeclared war against Russia, that Germany was
the invader and Russia the invaded, and look only to the evidence adduced to
support the theme that, after being invaded, Russia's actions were such as to
call for the executions of which the prosecution complains.
In behalf
of the defendants many so-called Russian exhibits were introduced. Among them
were documents on the Soviet foreign policy, statements emanating from the
Kremlin, articles from the Russian encyclopedia, and speeches made by Stalin.
All these exhibits are strictly irrelevant and might well be regarded as a red
herring drawn across the trail. But the Tribunal's policy throughout the trial
has been to admit everything which might conceivably elucidate the reasoning of
the defense. Thus, the excerpt from Stalin's speech of 3 July 1941, quoted in
Ohlendorf's document book, will be cited here. |
|
"In the areas occupied by the
enemy, cavalry and infantry partisan detachments must be formed and diversion
groups created for fighting the units of the enemy army, for kindling
|
465 |