|
have to shoot at this village. This
is the only way in which I can imagine this order, but never it is
inhuman to ask a son to shoot his parents.
"Q. So, therefore, if
you received such an order coming down the line, you would disincline to obey
it? You would not obey it?
"A. I would not have obeyed such an order.
"Q. Suppose the order came down for you to shoot the parents of someone
else, let us say, a Jew and his wife. And in your view you saw the children of
these parents. Now it is established beyond any doubt that this Jewish father
and Jewish mother have not committed any crime absolutely guiltless,
blemishless. The only thing that is established is that they are Jews. And you
have this order coming down the line to shoot them. The children are standing
by and they implore you not to shoot their parents. Would you shoot the
parents?
"A. I would not shoot these
parents." |
Then, in summing up, the witness was asked
|
|
"And, therefore, as a German
officer, you now tell the Tribunal that if an order were submitted to you,
coming down the line militarily to execute two innocent parents only because
they were Jews, you would refuse to obey that order?" |
And the answer was |
|
"I answered your example
affirmatively, I said Yes, I could not have obeyed."
|
Although defense counsel's query intended to
establish the utter helplessness of a German soldier in the face of a superior
command, the inquiry finally resulted in the defendant's declaring that he
would not only ignore the order of the supreme war lord to shoot his own
parents, but also to shoot anybody else's parents. He thus demonstrated that
under his own interpretation of German Military Law, he did have some choice in
the matter of obeying superior orders. Why then did he participate in the
execution of the parents of other people? Why did other defendants do the same
if they had a choice, as the defendant Seibert indicated ? |
|
Superior Orders Defense
Must Establish Ignorance of Illegality |
|
To plead superior orders one must show an
excusable ignorance of their illegality. The sailor who voluntarily ships on a
pirate craft may not be heard to answer that he was ignorant of the probability
he would be called upon to help in the robbing and sinking of other vessels. He
who willingly joins an illegal enterprise is charged with the natural
development of that unlawful undertaking. What SS man could say that he was
unaware of the attitude of Hitler toward Jewry? |
473 |