| |
| [puni...] tively. This bald statement in
itself does not suffice to exonerate one from a charge of unlawful killings.
Article I of the Hague Regulations provides |
| |
"The laws, rights, and duties of
war apply not only to armies, but also to militia and volunteer corps
fulfilling the following conditions:
"1. To be commanded by a
person responsible for his subordinates.
"2. To have a fixed
distinctive emblem recognizable at a distance.
"3. To carry arms
openly; and
"4. To conduct their operations in accordance with the laws
and customs of war." |
It is unnecessary to point out that, under
these provisions, an armed civilian found in a treetop sniping at uniformed
soldiers is not such a lawful combatant and can be punished even with the death
penalty if he is proved guilty of the offense.
But this is far
different from saying that resistance fighters in the war against an invading
army, if they fully comply with the conditions just mentioned, can be put
outside the law by the adversary. As the Hague Regulations state expressly, if
they fulfill the four conditions, "the laws, rights, and duties of war" apply
to them in the same manner as they apply to regular armies.
Many of the
defendants seem to assume that by merely characterizing a person a partisan, he
may be shot out of hand. But it is not so simple as that. If the partisans are
organized and are engaged in what international law regards as legitimate
warfare for the defense of their own country, they are entitled to be protected
as combatants. The record shows that in many of the areas where the
Einsatzgruppen operated, the so-called partisans had wrested considerable
territory from the German occupant, and that military combat action of some
dimensions was required to reoccupy those areas. In belligerent occupation the
occupying power does not hold enemy territory by virtue of any legal right. On
the contrary, it merely exercises a precarious and temporary actual control.
This can be seen from Article 42 of the Hague Regulations which grants certain
well limited rights to a military occupant only in enemy territory which is
"actually placed" under his control.
In reconquering enemy territory
which the occupant has lost to the enemy, he is not carrying out a police
performance but a regular act of war. The enemy combatants in this case are, of
course, also carrying out a war performance. They must, on their part, obey the
laws and customs of warfare, and if they do, and then |
492 |