. NMT05-T0029
Volume V · Page 29
| In conclusion are several
examples from the decisions of the Reich Disciplinary Court, which are
concerned with light and severe cases of actions in violation of duty:
1. Disparaging remarks against the National Socialist concept of the State, offending the sentiments of colleagues. Judgment of 15 December 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 31). 2. Distribution of illegal communist mischief-making papers. Judgment of 6 January 1931 (vol. 1937, p. 33). 3. Stubborn and continued participation in the North German sect of Jehovah's Witnesses. Judgment of 7 January 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 35) . 4. Inadmissible criticism of Government and Party measures and negative attitude towards the Winter Relief Organization. Judgment of 18 March 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 36). 5. Removal of a poster directed against political Catholicism, posted publicly by the NSDAP. Judgment of 11 May 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 42). 6. Cloaking of a Masonic Lodge by taking an attitude which creates the impression that the defendant is an enemy of the State. Judgment of 11 August 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 43). 7. Remarks directed against National Socialist ideology. Judgment of 2 March 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 76). 8. Remarks made in public against Party and State, offending the public sentiment. Judgment of 22 April 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 78). 9. Remarks which, although their exact wording does not contain a derogatory statement concerning the Fuehrer and other leading personalities of the movement, intend, however, according to their sense, an inappropriate joke. Judgment of 4 February 1936 (vol. 1937, p. 74). 10. Neglecting to denounce a colleague who has been guilty of communist propaganda. Judgment of 11 November 1935 (vol. 1936, p. 75). 11. Education of the son abroad in an ideology alien to the nation. Judgment of 14 March 1935 (vol. 1936, p. 87). 12. Insidious activities causing damage to the NSDAP. Judgment of 9 April 1935 (vol. 1936, p. 89). 13. Marxist attitude. Judgment of 21 March 1934 (vol. 1935, p. 69). 14. Use of communist forms of greeting. Judgment of 1 October 1935 (vol. 1936, p. 30) and 18 September 1935 (vol. 1936, p. 78). |
| * * * * * * * * * * |
