| |
a system of murder, torture, and
enslavement. They knew of the aims and practices of that system, and knowing
that, devoted their best efforts to the promotion of that system. They
participated in crimes of unprecedented magnitude and horror.
Justice
can only be served by capital punishment. |
| |
| * * * * * * * * *
* |
| |
| B. Closing Statement for
the Defendant Pohl¹ |
| |
| DR. SEIDL (counsel for the defendant Oswald
Pohl) : Your Honor, the final plea² for the defendant Oswald Pohl, which
is before you now, is, as can be seen by the index, divided into 12 parts.
Considering the time at my disposal, I will not read everything I have in the
index and I shall limit myself to quoting certain excerpts. In order to give
you a clear picture of what is contained in here, I would like to read the
index into the record |
| |
No. 1 deals with Control Council
Law No. 10, and particularly with the "crime against humanity" clause.
No. 2 deals with the structure and development of the SS Administration
from 1 February 1934 until 3 March 1942.
No. 3 deals with the
development and position of the Inspectorate of the Concentration Camps.
No. 4 deals with the incorporation of the Inspectorate of the
Concentration Camps into the Economic and Administrative Main Office.
No. 5 deals with the labor allocation of the inmates of concentration
camps.
No. 6 deals with the looting and sequestration of property in
the occupied countries.
No. 7 deals with the medical experiments.
No. 8 deals with Operation 14 f 13, Euthanasia.
No. 9 deals
with the Operation Reinhardt.
No. 10 deals with the Warsaw ghetto.
No. 11. "Acting Under Orders", and all the main questions in that
connection. |
__________ ¹ Closing statement is
reproduced in full as it was read in court. However, deletions from original
text of speech as prepared by counsel are shown by asterisks. ² The
"Final Plea" referred to was a mimeographed plea filed with the Tribunal before
the delivery of the closing statement. This plea is not reproduced herein
except insofar as Dr. Seidl quotes from it extensively in the closing statement
on behalf of the defendant Pohl. Page references pertain to the page numbers of
the mimeographed final plea as presented to the Tribunal. The expedient of
referring to and reading from a written plea already before the Tribunal was
adopted by Dr. Seidl after the Tribunal had made the following statement on 16
September 1947 concerning the time allowed for closing statements: "The
Tribunal has before it the motion of Dr. Seidl for the defendant Pohl, asking
that he be allowed six hours in which to present his argument. The motion will
be denied, but three hours will be allowed. Any argument which Dr. Seidl is
unable to present orally may be submitted to the Tribunal in writing and will
be read and considered as fully as if he had read it in open court. The
Petition of Dr. Heim for two hours for the defendant Hohberg will be denied. He
will be allowed the hour and a half which other counsel are allowed." (Tr. p.
7471.)
865 |