. NMT05-T1168
Volume V · Page 1168
| X. SUPPLEMENTAL
JUDGMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL |
|||
| As stated in the original judgment, the defendants were arraigned on 10 March 1947, and the taking of proof began on 8 April 1947. During 101 court sessions, terminating 22 September 1947, the prosecution offered in evidence 742 documents, and the defendants 614 documents. The transcript of the proof consisted of 8,048 pages, exclusive of the judgment. The transcript of the closing argument of the prosecution consists of 73 typewritten pages. The transcript of the closing argument of the defense counsel includes the following: | |||
| Oswald Pohl | 152 pages | ||
| August Frank | 79 pages | ||
| Georg Loerner | 63 pages | ||
| Heinz Karl Fanslau | 19 pages | ||
| Hans Loerner | 18 pages | ||
| Erwin Tschentscher | 56 pages | ||
| Max Kiefer | 36 pages | ||
| Franz Eirenschmalz | 50 pages | ||
| Karl Sommer | 54 pages | ||
| Hermann Pook | 22 pages | ||
| Hans Baier | 41 pages | ||
| Hans Hohberg | 63 pages | ||
| Leo Volk | 55 pages | ||
| Karl Mummenthey | 33 pages | ||
| Hans Bobermin | 55 pages | ||
| Josef Vogt | 39 pages | ||
| Rudolf Scheide | 43 pages | ||
| Horst Klein | 31 pages | ||
| _______ | |||
| Total | 909 pages | ||
| On 3 November 1947 the judgment was read in open Court and sentence imposed upon those defendants found guilty. Subsequently, counsel for the convicted defendants filed petitions with the Military Governor of the United States Zone of Occupation asking revision of the sentences under Article XVII(a) of Ordinance No. 7. In these petitions various reasons were given for revision of the judgment, including claims that the proof had not been properly evaluated by the Tribunal, that various exhibits had been misinterpreted, that findings of fact were not supported by the evidence, and that there was injustice in the disparity of sentences. Two defendants stated that in preparing the judg- […ment] | |||
