"In the year 1914 he completed his
studies in architecture, was graduated, and soon thereafter became city
architect for the city of Aachen" |
| This finding was taken from the affidavit of
the defendant, Document NO-1922, Prosecution Ex. 11. Portions of this affidavit
which are pertinent to this finding are as follows: |
| |
"Then I studied for two and
one-half years at the Munich Technical Academy and proceeded Easter 1910 from
Munich to the Aix-la-Chapelle [Aachen] Technical Academy where I passed my
examination as an architect in 1914.
"Subsequently I was employed by
the government at Aix-la- Chapelle as chief of office and leading architect for
the new building for the district court and the local court at
Aix-la-Chapelle." |
| On Transcript page 3298 of the record, when
the defendant was testifying in his own behalf, he testified to the
following: |
| |
"In 1914 I was graduated as an
architect and a city architect in Aachen." |
Therefore it may be readily seen that the
statement in the brief of the defendant to the effect that the finding of the
Tribunal on this point was a complete fabrication is entirely unfounded, the
truth being that this conclusion and statement by the Tribunal was taken from
the sworn testimony of the defendant himself.
This sort of
misrepresentation causes the Tribunal to suspect the integrity and sincerity of
many other statements in the briefs filed by defense counsel.
The
defendant complains that the following passage which occurs on Transcript page
8134 of the judgment, is incorrect and avers that the defendant, in
cross-examination, expressly cleared up this matter. This passage is as
follows: |
| |
"The defendant as chief of office C
II was also head of the main department in charge of general affairs of the
Building Inspectorate." |
| In Document NO-1288, Pros. Ex. 44, doc. Book
2, page 83, the following appears: [Page 9 of original]
|
| |