 |
[be
] tween Germany and France. At least
I repeat the words he spoke in his radio address of the year before. This
address has been published in all the newspapers. That was the aim of the
Bruening government and Dietrich.
The Bruening government, soon after
the conclusion of the coal deal, had to resign, not because of the deal, but
for other reasons. Of course the deal afterward was criticized by the
succeeding government. After all, that was no miracle. It had been concluded in
the last days of the [Bruening] government. It was criticized by opposing
parties, also by the Social Democrats. The amount paid was considerably above
the exchange rates of the day, but still the amount was very low considering
the value. And a few years afterward, the German Reich resold the shares and
made a profit which I must estimate to be about RM 30,000,000. If the German
Reich had waited a few years longer, then they would have made a profit of
about 30,000,000 or 40,000,000 more, but the German Reich in 1936 sold the
shares. |
| |
| * * * * * * * * * * *
|
__________ * Cross-examination
concerning the Gelsenkirchen transaction was closely related to the question of
defendant Flick's contributions to political parties. Extracts from Flick's
testimony on this subject upon cross-examination are reproduced below in
section V G.
225 |