 |
this was a matter of the German Government, and this compensation
certainly amounted to only a modest fraction of what the plants were worth to
the expropriated owners and had cost them, but the compensation was given by
the German Government to the previous German owners.
All the plants in
German ownership had been built by Germans with the exception of the plants of
the firm of de Wendel. The family of de Wendel had been in Lorraine for 200
years. It was the oldest industrial family. They were the first to build plants
in Lorraine even before 1870. But all the remaining plants, Rombach,
Gleidingen, Hamerdingen, and so on, had been built by Germans in the times
between 1871 and 1918. During this period the development of the Lorraine
industrial district took place in general because of a technical discovery made
during this time This was the so-called Thomas process or basic Bessemer steel
process, which was the prerequisite for the efficient smelting of the ores
which are found in Lorraine. These were ores with a high percentage of
phosphorus and these could only be exploited profitably after the invention of
the two Englishmen, Gilchrist and Thomas, and this invention, I think, dates
back to the end of the 1870s, and this is the explanation why all the works
except de Wendel, who used to work on a different basis, were built during the
German period.
Q. And de Wendel, as a Lorraine family then, kept their
French nationality, or rather regained it, and kept their property
A.
Yes.
Q. The only ones?
A. Yes.
Q. You said the Germans,
in the sense of the Germans from the old Reich [Altreich] as one used to say in
Lorraine, were expropriated. Excuse me. Lawyers are sometimes a little
pedantic. I would not like any misunderstanding to occur. Do you want to say
that a formal act of expropriation was carried out by the competent German
Government or do you only mean to say that by the annexation of Lorraine by
France, in practice the Germans lost their property?
A. The latter was
certainly the case. How this took place formally I can't say for certain but
probably it was also a consequence of the peace treaty, I don't know.
Q. Certainly. It was not only pedantry on my part but I had to attach
value to this clarification because later on we will come to the question
whether the French were expropriated by the Nazi government; that is, whether
at any time they ever lost their prop- [
erty] |
932 |