. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0264


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 264
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
[Ger…] many was gradually forced to make its entire manpower available for armament purposes and other necessities of the struggle. Other European countries experienced a similar development. I shall submit to the Court the basic legal provisions in this respect. Even in non-totalitarian states, the conception of compulsory labor service prevailed more and more during and after the war. As the war progressed and the requirements of the troops increased, the manpower available in Germany by no means sufficed to cover the demands of industry and agriculture. The government therefore decided to cover these requirements by utilizing the population of countries occupied by German troops, or that of other European countries. This was done at first by voluntary recruitment and later by so-called labor conscription. I shall present documents to show the methods by which this was done. Everywhere the details of procurement and treatment of foreign workers were regulated by laws or decrees or international treaties. Nor were provisions for welfare and leisure overlooked.

In view of this comprehensive program, the smallest details of which were subject to official regulation, the average German entrepreneur in all fields of economy never entertained the thought that there was anything illegal or criminal or inhumane in employing foreign workers, provided he took proper and good care of them in accordance with the respective regulations. Hundreds of thousands, yes, even millions of farmers, craftsmen, and industrialists were in the same position. With the increasing effectiveness of modern technical warfare on land, at sea, and in the air, the life of the people came to be directed and regulated in all details by government measures. It would hardly have occurred to any one of these German businessmen to check the legality of these events on the basis of traditional German conceptions of international and public law, and it would have been most difficult to do so in National Socialist Germany during the war, owing to the secret location and transfer of many libraries. In any case, he would not have been able to refute the general conceptions outlined above. Within the scope of presentation of evidence I shall deal briefly with this [situation] and its historic reasons. Perhaps the argument will be put forth that these Germans might have been taught better by a study of foreign systems of international law.

This leads me to the last and most important point which I shall discuss when presenting my evidence, and which excludes the culpability of the individual private industrialist and farmer in connection with the employment of foreign labor. In this modern, so-called "total" economic war, production — regardless of its type — carried out by the manager of a large industrial or agricultural




264
Next Page NMT Home Page