. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0286


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 286
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
[influ…] ence on the plant management and business management of these independent enterprises, so that my client's responsibility in this connection cannot be considered.

Under count four of the indictment, my client was charged with having been a member of the SS after 1 September 1939, and a member of the Himmler Circle of Friends. I shall prove that my client was never an active member of the SS, had no command, belonged to no society, performed no service in the 55, but that he was merely a so-called honorary leader [Ehrenfuehrer] and that these are not to be considered as active members of the SS. I wish to point out here that the IMT judgment did not condemn persons charged before it because they belonged to the SS, insofar as they were purely honorary leaders. More evidence will be brought on this point too. On this assumption, however, Dr. Buetefisch cannot be condemned on the charge of belonging to an organization which has been declared criminal. In this connection, the evidence on the Circle of Friends presented by the prosecution in support of its assertion must be gone into and, by the presentation of further evidence, the nature of this so-called Circle of Friends will have to be subjected to a closer examination.

Concerning count five of the indictment, the examination of the prosecution's assertion will reveal, through the submission of further evidence, that there can be no question of Dr. Buetefisch's having taken part in a common plan to commit war crimes. In the interrogations which preceded the prosecution's investigations, details were required from my client which he had to produce purely from memory, without any records whatsoever. This gave rise, in some instances, to erroneous statements which were disclosed when Dr. Buetefisch had the opportunity to look up documents. Insofar as such erroneous statements were found to have been made, these will be corrected in the course of the personal interrogation of my client. 
 
M. Opening Statement for Defendant Haefliger¹ 
 
DR. VON METZLER (counsel for defendant Haefliger):² May it please the Tribunal: In addressing Your Honors on behalf of
__________
¹  Tr. pages 4821-4831, 19 December 1947.
²  Counsel read the opening statement in English. Dr. von Metzler, was entrusted by the entire defense to make one of two closing statements on behalf of all the defendants. This closing statement is reproduced below in section XI E, volume VIII, this series. The final statement of the defendant Haefliger to the Tribunal appears in section XII 7, volume VIII, this series.
 



286
Next Page NMT Home Page