. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0329


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 329
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
character was a guarantee that they would not deviate from the principles of medical ethics. This independence of the Behringwerke explains why Professor Lautenschlaeger was not informed as to the details of the clinical tests, as, in keeping with Lautenschlaeger's directives, the Behringwerke passed on the vaccines to be clinically tested independently from him. These preparations for testing purposes were not newly discovered products, but well-known and previously tested vaccines. There is not a single point in the evidence adduced by the prosecution against the Behringwerke which shows that these plants, in the process of supplying and testing the preparations, gained any knowledge of the improper application of these vaccines by criminal doctors. The defense, in presenting its evidence, will confirm this statement through the testimony of witnesses and documents.

In the Hoechst plant, which was immediately subordinate to Lautenschlaeger, preparations for testing purposes were issued by one of his subordinates. The careful selection of that subordinate as well as his high professional qualifications were the special concern of Professor Lautenschlaeger. The defense will establish that, in the instances put forward by the prosecution, the preparations for testing purposes were issued in exactly the same manner as in all routine cases. The day came when, as a result of Dr. Ding's visit, Professor Lautenschlaeger became aware of the doubtful medical qualifications of this SS doctor, as well as of his questionable character, though he did not realize that the man was a criminal. It will be proved that from that very moment, Professor Lautenschlaeger issued the clear instruction that Ding no longer was to be employed as a clinical tester, and that he was to be excluded from this work. It will be shown that this order was complied with.

In presenting its evidence, the defense will also shed light on another point on which, so far, there seems to be some confusion. The inclusion of Mrugowsky and his office in the circle of the doctors enlisted for the clinical testing of preparations can in no way be construed as meaning that Dr. Ding was also included. Mrugowsky was the chief hygienist of a branch of the Wehrmacht and of other formations specially detailed to the eastern epidemic areas. There was, therefore, no reason for not supplying Mrugowsky's office with preparations, quite apart from the fact that, as things stood in Germany, this would have been impossible. Therefore, subsequent correspondence with Mrugowsky cannot be adduced as proof (as the prosecution does) of a continued collaboration with Dr. Ding.

As for Professor Lautenschlaeger's work as chief of the Betriebsgemeinschaft Maingau [Works Combine Main River Val- […ley]




329
Next Page NMT Home Page