. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0331


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 331
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
[Wehrwirt…] schaftsfuehrer] (facts adduced by the prosecution), do not make the slightest difference in this connection. Everything Lautenschlaeger did for his foreign workers and everything he did to maintain the peacetime level of the production of medicines, he had to do in opposition to the Nazi Party, which watched him with suspicious eyes.

The defense, in presenting its case in chief, will show that there is no evidence in support of, but everything against, the thesis that this man was a party to the planning and preparation of a criminal war. The drafting of air-raid protection plans, the completion of production plans in the event of mobilization, as well as the subsequent delivery of preliminary products which, with further processing, might be utilized for war purposes, is within the framework of national defense measures which all countries of the world take in the ordinary course. This did not in any way change the nature of the Hoechst plant as an enterprise predominantly manufacturing medicines and other peace-time products.

The defense will begin its case in chief with the examination of Professor Lautenschlaeger, who will testify on his own behalf.¹ The defense will also submit numerous documents and call a few essential witnesses. 
 
T. Opening Statement for Defendant Mann ² 
 
DR. BERNDT (counsel for defendant Mann) : Your Honor, may I ask whether the Tribunal will agree to hear me now? It is seven to twelve now, and I shall take up approximately twenty-five minutes.

THE PRESIDENT: Very well, we will hear you now, Doctor.

DR. BERNDT: May it please the Court: Anyone coming to Leverkusen will perceive next to the main IG administration building another building that strikes you by its plain, clear, and utilitarian structural features. It stands there, bare of any adornment, with the world-renowned Bayer cross on its middle section. It is connected by a bridge with the main administration building. This building is the seat of the Bayer Sales Combine. In past years, the father of the defendant Mann was manager of the Bayer Sales Combine; in 1931, my client succeeded his father in this position. Just like the building, the sales combine was
__________
¹ Later the defendant Lautenschlaeger elected not to testify. Two other defendants. Schmitz and Von Schnitzler, also elected not to testify.
² Tr. pp. 4883-4891, 19 December 1947.
 



331
Next Page NMT Home Page