. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0389


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 389
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
"Member of Nazi Party, German Labor Front, National Socialist Lawyers' Association; member of 4 committees and several sub-committees of the Reich Group Industry dealing with law, patents, trademarks, market regulations, etc.; member of a large number of professional associations."]  
    
    
    
EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT
VON KNIERIEM*  
 
REDIRECT EXAMINATION

JUDGE HEBERT: Dr. von Knieriem, I have one or two questions. Were votes ever taken at meetings of the Farben Vorstand?

DEFENDANT VON KNIERIEM: I cannot remember that a formal taking of votes had ever taken place. There may perhaps have been one exception. We may have once done that when the contract between I.G. Farben and I.G. Chemie was dissolved, but I am not quite sure about that.

Q. Then, under the practice of not taking votes at the Vorstand meetings, was it commonly understood by members of the Vorstand that when a report was made, if dissent was not expressed, that that amounted to Vorstand approval of the policy or action reflected in that report?

A. Yes, that's to be assumed. That is, based upon the information of the various Vorstand members resulting from any report.

Q. Would the situation be generally the same with respect to the TEA?

A. Yes, if any decisions were reached in the TEA and if there was no dissenting opinion, the situation would have remained the same.

Q. If an important difference of policy arose within Farben, where did the responsibility for resolving that difference of opinion lie?

A. According to the bylaws of the Vorstand, one could take a vote and the majority would decide and, if the votes were equal, that party became decisive which had the vote of the president [chairman].

Q. Are you referring now to a vote in the Vorstand?

A. Yes.

Q. But you recall only one instance in which there was a vote. I think that's all the questions I have.
__________
*Complete testimony is recorded in the mimeographed transcript, 1, 6, 9, and 10 February 1918, pp. 6485-6715. Further extracts from the testimony are reproduced below in sections VII I 6b; VII K 3b; VII L 3b: VII M 6b.  



389
Next Page NMT Home Page