. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0417


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 417
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
Q. Was that industry, during the war, employing concentration-camp inmates by allocation?

A. Yes.

Q. If these allocations had been refused by the plants, namely to employ concentration-camp inmates, would that have been possible?

A. That would have been quite impossible for the plants.

Q. In that case, I suppose the same consequences would have arisen which you described in a more general way before in case a plant refused to employ foreign workers.

A. Yes, quite. 
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
2. TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESS FRIEDRICH FLICK,
HEAD OF THE FLICK CONCERN¹  
 
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF FRIEDRICH FLICK² 
 
DIRECT EXAMINATION  
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
DR. SIEMERS (counsel for defendant von Schnitzler) : Dr. Flick, I am coming back to the question of the Election Fund of 1933. Could one of these prominent industrialists refuse to attend this meeting which was called by Goering?³

WITNESS FLICK: He could do that, if he did not consider the consequences, but, naturally, he would have regretted it. As I said, I — and I think that also held true for other industrialists, or, at least, for many — was frequently called to attend conferences and meetings held by the preceding government. If, now, the same industrialist had not followed a call of a prominent member of the new government — in particular, of the Prime Minister — that would certainly have been considered as an open affront.

I could give you an example: When the well-known big industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, at a later date did not obey another  
__________
¹ Friedrich Flick was the principal defendant in Case I before Tribunal IV in Nuernberg. At the time of his testimony in the Farben case. he was serving a prison sentence of seven years upon his conviction for participation in the slave-labor program, the spoliation of property in occupied countries and membership in and support of the SS, principally through membership in the Himmler Circle of Friends (see vol. VI, this series).
² Complete testimony (Case 6) is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 12 March 1948, pp. 9018-9093.
³ This refers to an election fund of 1,000,000 marks contributed by a number of industrialists or industrial firms in connection with the Reichstag election of 1 March 1933. The Farben concern contributed 400,000 marks. Evidence concerning the election fund appears below in section VII C 3.




417
Next Page NMT Home Page