. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0643


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 643
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
you were not on the Vorstand, we need not go into this. Because of your work in 1938 in Czechoslovakia, I should merely like to ask you, did you have anything to do with the approval of the contribution of 100,000 marks for the Sudeten Relief project?¹

DEFENDANT KUGLER: No, that was not under my jurisdiction.

Q. Did you hear about it afterwards?

A. Yes, I did. I cannot tell you the exact date.

Q. Did you hear anything in the course of your work which indicated the purpose of this contribution?

A. No. I was convinced that it was for purely charitable purposes; that is, that it was to help out the refugees in their distress; that in those weeks and months, many Sudeten Germans fled to Germany; I had not only read it in the newspapers but I had more direct evidence of that.

Q. You are referring to a letter which you received at the time?

A. Yes, Document 27.

Q. This letter, which confirms what my client has just said is my Document 27 from document book II, which I offer as Kugler Defense Exhibit 25.² [*]
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
 
6. TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESS MILCH AND
PROSECUTION WITNESS OHLENDORF 
 
a. Testimony of Erhard Milch 
 
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE
WITNESS ERHARD MILCH³ 
 
DIRECT EXAMINATION 
 
* * * * * * * * * *  
 
DR. BOETTCHER (counsel for defendant Krauch) : Tell us the position of industry in a dictatorship and its relationship to the authority of the state?

WITNESS MILCH: In regard to the whole question of private industry, Hitler was not quite definite up to 1933. It was generally believed that he would remove private industry and have it nationalized. He did not do so; but he distrusted industry. He was also afraid that his main work, which was to adjust the differences between labor and capital and the state might be
__________
¹ See Document NI-1318, Prosecution Exhibit 834. reproduced in subsection C 4. Introduced also as Kugler Document 27, Kugler Defense Exhibit 25.
² Reproduced in subsection C 4.
³ Complete testimony is recorded in the mimeographed transcript. 15 January and 5 March 1948, pp. 5296-5347; and 8335-8550. Further extracts are reproduced above in section V B 1.  
[* Transcriber's note: This reference is apparently incorrect. It should refer to: Document Kluger 25, Kluger Defense Exhibit 27 instead of vice-versa — HWM]




643
Next Page NMT Home Page