 |
| Article 24 |
| |
| There should be no increase in the price of goods and services of any
kind because of raw or auxiliary materials, freight charges, or other expenses,
the utilization or expenditure of which is due solely to the special demands of
one branch of the economy but which, with respect to type, quantity, and source
of supply, are not compatible with the principles of economic
efficiency. |
| |
| * * * * * * * * * * |
| |
| Article 30 |
| |
The decree takes effect on the day of its promulgation. Berlin, 4
September 1939 |
The Chairman of the Ministerial Council for
Reich Defense
GOERING Field Marshal
The Deputy of the
Fuehrer
R. HESS
The Plenipotentiary General for the Reich
Administration
FRICK
The Reich Minister and Chief of the Reich
Chancellery
DR. LAMMERS
The Chief of the High Command of the
Wehrmacht
KEITEL |
| |
| |
| 3. TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KRAUCH |
| |
EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY
OF DEFENDANT KRAUCH¹
|
| |
| DIRECT EXAMINATION |
| |
| * * * * * * * * * * |
| |
| DR. BOETTCHER (counsel for defendant Krauch) : And now, let me
discuss one point in connection with the examination of Goering's State
Secretary, Koerner, who appeared here as a witness for the prosecution. During
cross-examination, when Koerner was heard 2 on the meaning and purpose of the
Four Year Plan, mention was made of a memorandum of Hitler's referring to the
Four Year Plan, dated 1936. This memorandum was offered into evidence as
Prosecution Exhibit 411 [Document NI-4955].3
Would you briefly define your attitude towards the contents of this memorandum?
My first question: Did this memorandum |
__________
¹ Further extracts
from the testimony of the defendant Krauch are reproduced above in subsection C
5 and below in subsections G 7, H 4, I 7, L 8, and N 5, and in sec. IX F 1,
vol. VIII, this series.
² Counsel refers to redirect examination of
Witness Koerner (defendant in the Ministries is, case). See tr. p. 2284.
³ Reproduced in part above in subsection F 2
851 |
. 
