. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T1039


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 1039
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
materials, as interfering to some extent with the Karinhall Plan, and you declared the West Wall was constructed for defensive purposes. Now, in what sense do you consider the construction of the West Wall for defensive purposes?

A. It was intended for the event of war, in case an attack was made on Germany from the West. Here, in the West, were the industrial centers of the German Reich, and it was quite in line with the idea of defense for a wall to be built here to protect these industrial areas. A similar measure had been taken by the French. Immediately after the First World War, they built the Maginot Line against an attack from Germany. The West Wall is approximately equal to the Maginot Line as far as its defensive capacity is concerned.

Q. Well now, you recall that you testified that in the speeches of Goering and Hitler, in December 1936, they stressed the danger of invasion from the East and discussed precautionary measures to be taken now, in the light of this. How did you reconcile, in your own mind, the fact that a West Wall was erected for what you describe as "defensive purposes," and that no comparable wall was erected in the East?

A. Germany, in the First World War, had experienced the terrible consequences of a two-front war. I am not a military man, and I cannot judge the line of thought of the General Staff. I can speak only as a layman. But it is possible that it was considered that in the East the terrain was not quite so suitable for the construction of such a wall. As far as I know, and I know very little about the matter, mountains, rivers, and so forth are necessary on which defenses can be based. Perhaps the situation was not so good in the East as in the West. Perhaps the General Staff intended to rely on pure defense in the West, a so-called static warfare similar to that of the First World War, and to have mobile warfare in the East when attacked — as the mode of defense.

Q. Now, in discussing your conference with Goering in June 1938 you spoke, I believe, of a conference which Bosch had had with General von Brauchitsch and General Beck, who had advised Bosch that they feared that the Nazi foreign policy would lead to war, and you described Bosch's attitude that a war would be untenable from the point of view of the German economy. Is that right?

A. Yes, that is correct.

Q. To your knowledge, did Bosch ever express this attitude to other officials of Farben?

A. I cannot say that with certainty. At that time, in view of my position, I had no regular contact with other members of the Vorstand. I can only say that Brauchitsch — that is, Field Marshal  




1039
Next Page NMT Home Page