. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T1370


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 1370
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
I do, however, believe that this connection with the new plants could be of great value to the Rottweil powder plant in the future, particularly also for the replacements. This type of temporary supervision is not too great a burden and we only recommend it. 
 
[Signed] OSTERBURG 
 
 
  TRANSLATION OF
DOCUMENT NI-6345
PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 327
 
LEITER FROM DR. MUELLER, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF DAG, TO DR, LUDWIGS, MEMBER OF FARBEN'S SALES COMBINE CHEMICALS, 30 APRIL 1940 
 
30 April 1940
No. 178 
 
Herrn Direktor Walther Ludwigs,
I.G. Farbenindustrie Aktiengesellschaft, Sales
Combine Chemicals
Frankfurt/Main 20

Your Ref.: Dept. L Ga/Scha

Dear Mr. Ludwigs,

Troisdorf had asked for information on the quantities of acetylcellulose delivered to Speyer by IG for manufacture of Ecarite.* Frankfurt stated in their reply dated 17 April that they were opposed on principle to giving the desired information regarding total turnover of Ecarite.

Since the DAG is to all intents and purposes a branch of the IG, I cannot see any reason why there should be objections to supplying the desired figures. It is unfortunate enough that Speyer of all people, a firm which has never in the past worked with acetylcellulose, should have no difficulty at all in procuring it at a time when IG is unable to supply the quantities of acetylcellulose we require. Speyer is in fact getting its supplies at our expense. You will remember what efforts I made some time ago to incorporate Speyer in a sales combine [Verkaufsgesellschaft] along with all other celluloid manufacturers. You will also remember Speyer's somewhat peculiar behavior on that occasion. Why then should IG give preference to such firms over members of its own organization? You also know that I was never inwardly satisfied with what was done in the question about camphor. Wherever Speyer entered the picture it also managed to obtain an advantage for itself. We had to pay RM 1.80 for home-produced camphor while Speyer paid only
__________
* A cellulose acetate.
 



1370
Next Page NMT Home Page