|
|
3. Debits with banks |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. IG Clearing account |
|
|
|
Our credit against which the deliveries since July ist are still
to be balanced |
47,711,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Account of the G.m.b.H. zur Verwertung chemischer Erzeugnisse -
the G.m.b.H. has a credit of |
68,838,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Outstanding debts in business with the Armed
Forces |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the DAG |
56,548,000 |
|
|
At the G.m.b.H |
124,619,000 |
|
|
|
With the German Salute
Dynamit-Aktien-Gesellschaft
vormals Alfred Nobel & Co |
|
|
5. TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT GAJEWSKI |
|
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT
GAJEWSKI¹ |
|
DIRECT EXAMINATION |
|
* * * * * * * * * * |
|
DR. WEYER (associate counsel for defendant Gajewski) : In connection
with the powder part of the work in Rottweil,² which we have already
described, I now come to the relationship between I.G. Farben and Dynamit-Nobel
(DAG). You said that the powder production in Rottweil was not directed by
Farben or your Sparte but by the DAG. What was the relationship of these two
firms to each other?
DEFENDANT GAJEWSKI: Farben owned a considerable
share of the capital of the DAG. I cannot give you the exact percentage at the
moment. Furthermore, there was a contract for the community of interest between
the two companies.
Q. Can you briefly give us the important parts of
the contents of this contract, very briefly?
A. According to this
contract for the community of interests,³ the DAG was to give the net
profit to Farben. On the other hand, Farben guaranteed a dividend to the DAG
which was to be in a definite relationship to the dividend which was given by
|
__________ ¹ Further extracts are
reproduced above in subsections V C3, VII C5d, and I 3e. ² A
subsidiary firm of Farben. ³ The community-of-interests agreement is
not reproduced herein. However, for a contemporaneous description of the
agreement, see the extracts from the "Handbook of German Joint Corporations,"
Document NI-7221, Prosecution Exhibit 223,
reproduced in subsection M 4.
1372 |