. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T1525


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 1525
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
1. In my affidavit of 2 April 1947 (NI-5188), paragraphs 14 and 22, I have stated the principal objections which I had to the Nazi regime. At no time during the Nazi regime did I offer any kind of resistance to the regime which in any way endangered my personal liberty, my freedom, or my property. Because of the restraint upon freedom of expression, I did not talk about my feelings to the regime openly, but I expressed many of my concerns often within confidential circles and especially to a few of my close friends or collaborators, including Dr. Bernhard Buhl, Prof. Erwin Selck, and Dr. Karl Lueer. However, my lack of enthusiasm for the Nazi regime and the NSDAP were sufficiently well known so that I don't think anyone considered me an active supporter of the NSDAP. I consider myself as one of Bosch's closer associates and as he was our “great man” his ideas and reactions have at all time impressed me very much. He once told me, “The great thing is that I.G. Farben must outlast the Nazis.”

2. Quite soon after the Nazis came to power, I felt so strongly in opposition to the Nazi regime that I seriously considered resigning from my position in I.G. Farben and retiring from active participation in German industrial life. In late 1934 or early 1935, the matter had gone so far that I had a long discussion on the matter with Prof. Erwin Selck, an old friend of mine. I told him that I felt extremely upset by a number of happenings in Germany, that many things in Germany were in contradiction to my convictions, including the Roehm affair, and that I thought it best to resign my position altogether. Selck thereupon became extremely lively in his conversation. He said that I was absolutely wrong; that the only hope for Germany was that the Party would get over the revolutionary stage and become more reasonable; and that at last reason would prevail in Germany. Selck said that persons like me had to remain and do their duty to avoid replacement by men closely connected with the Party who would overrun everything in I.G. Farben if men like me were replaced. Selck’s viewpoint finally prevailed and thereafter I never seriously considered resigning again.

3. For the period from my conversation with Selck to the Anschluss, I want to state the following. Most Germans considered Germany's foreign policy before 1938 a good deal from the consideration of what other countries might have done, but did not do, to interfere. When there was no interference by the other countries, there was little incentive to interfere within Germany. Moreover, it certainly seemed to me that Hitler tried to come to an agreement with England, and after the German-British Naval Treaty of 1935, I thought there might be some  

 
1525
Next Page NMT Home Page