. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0036


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 36
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
concerning the economic and technical conditions of the plant and an approval by the Vorstand concerning some steps to be taken pursuant to acquiring these plants — it seems to me it is exceedingly clear.

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: That is just the point that I was thinking about; your point last mentioned there. I think that I remember that you had evidence in chief on that, did you not, on the organization of this buffer company?

MR. SPRECHER: Yes, Your Honor, there has been evidence concerning that buffer company, but the last witness indicated that there was no relationship between his activities and this acquisition. Perhaps introducing this document would have been anticipatory and cumulative — and Your Honors specifically asked us to avoid introducing anticipatory and cumulative evidence at the early stage of this trial. We have attempted to comply. Now, when we come to a piece of testimony like we have just had, I don't think this is any longer anticipatory, and it is certainly no longer cumulative, and adds to the whole coordination between the trip which this defendant had — although we certainly do not say that that was the only thing that inspired Farben to acquire the Boruta plant. But we do submit that it shows a direct relationship which Your Honors must consider in connection with measuring the conduct of this and other defendants.

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: Well, I am more concerned about keeping the prosecution conscious of not abusing the functions of rebuttal by giving us cumulative documents than I am about the question on this particular document. Your point may be well taken, but please scrutinize your documents pretty carefully so that we do not got ourselves into a situation of having documents presented under the pretext of rebuttal that should have been in chief. That is just an admonition. I am not ready to say that this violates that rule; I just wish you would watch that because that is a danger that is hard to guard against. 
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
5. TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESS SCHWAB 
 
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE
WITNESS HERMANN SCHWAB* 
 
DIRECT EXAMINATION 
 
DR. VON KELLER (associate counsel for defendant von Schnitzler): Witness, for the record, will you please state the date and place of your birth?
__________
* Complete testimony is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 29 and 30 January 1948, pp. 6052-6135.
 
36
Next Page NMT Home Page