 |
[recom….] mended the French group to take up the matter with
their government in order to eliminate the last obstacle to an understanding.
Mr. Duchemin then asked us to declare our preparedness to talk to the French
Government representatives together with him and his colleagues. I declared
that I would only be able to do that in the presence of representatives of our
own government. Mr. Duchemin thereupon went to see Mr. Barnaud and Mr. Pucheux.
Those two, in their turn, called upon Mr. Michel, and thus, at the request of
the French, the final discussion took place in the presence of
representatives of both governments.
I believe that I have herewith
informed you about all important matters on the course the Paris negotiations
took. I should be happy if the results were equally welcomed by all quarters as
accomplished by the joint efforts of both government and private
economy. |
| |
Signed Signature
[Handwritten] v. SCHNITZLER |
| |
| |
| |
PARTIAL TRANSLATION OF
DOCUMENT NI-15220
PROSECUTION EXHIBIT
2153 |
| |
| EXTRACTS FROM A LETTER OF DEFENDANT KUGLER TO DEFENDANT VON
SCHNITZLER, 12 MAY 1941 12 May 1941 |
| |
| [Handwritten notes] |
1. Trip, D e n c k e r -
Wallenborn
ter Meer |
| a. Correct translation? |
2. Distribute evaluating data |
| b. Number of excerpts complete? |
3. Work on reduction (? ) |
| |
4. Collate bylaws |
|
| |
Dear Mr. von Schnitzler
I. On Saturday, Dr. Kramer got here
from Paris and brought with him the new version of the “Convention”
and the bylaws. He also brought along translations of those parts of the Loehr
draft that were handed over to the French in Paris, together with remarks; and
also various other documents, details of which appear from the memorandum
[bordereau] attached to Mr. Frossard’s letter of the 9th addressed to you,
which is enclosed herewith. Dr. Kramer simultaneously submitted a file note on
a discussion which he had with Mr. Duchemin on the 8th — paragraph 3 of
the note likewise refers to the bylaws and the draft of the agreement. Copy of
the file note is also enclosed herewith.
This morning, in a first
reading in a small circle (Kuepper, Rospatt, Loehr, Eckert, Kramer) we sifted
the final version of the French, including their remarks concerning the parts
of the Loehr draft that were given to them; we also compared these with our own
notes of the last meeting in Paris. This, unfortunately, completely confirmed
the |
129 |
. 
