. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0209


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 209
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
Q. Did Dr. Kuepper express any opinion with respect to Mr. Loncle’s statement?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you personally discuss this with him?

A. Yes.

Q. Do you remember his written statement which is contained in Exhibit 2150?

A. I received this document after cross-examination this morning. I read it and I remember the paper very well.

Q. According to this document, and according to your personal conversation, did Dr. Kuepper approve of M. Loncle’s opinion, or do you remember any statement to the contrary?

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: We well remember that Dr. Kuepper was a witness here and testified quite fully with respect to that very point; that the Preamble was prescribed by governmental authorities and that it did not represent the views of Farben. That’s all in the record here. This is highly repetitious. We well remember the details of Dr. Kuepper on the witness stand telling that whole story. Now, no good point would be accomplished by just burdening this record with repetition of that when the best source of what Dr. Kuepper had to say about it is his own testimony.

DR. SIEMERS: I beg your pardon, Your Honor. I wouldn't have brought up this matter at all if the prosecution hadn't submitted the document.

I therefore want to ask you, Dr. Kugler, only whether Dr. Kuepper told you anything about it? What was your opinion about the complete form of this Preamble?

A. After I have been able to refresh my memory by reading Exhibit 2150,* 1 can state the following. This document shows the actual position of Farben. It further proves basically what I said during cross-examination, before knowing the document. I should like to refer to the last paragraph of the Exhibit 2150 where Dr. Kuepper says that the misgivings of M. Loncle are not very serious and important. He furthermore says that the background and history of the negotiations does not only become apparent from the Preamble, but can be proved by the statements of the Frenchmen themselves. Dr. Kuepper concludes his opinion by saying — and this opinion was approved by von Schnitzler, ter Meer, Waibel and all the other addressees — 
 
“Should it be impossible, therefore, to have the ‘Expose’ [Preamble] struck out, we can still accommodate ourselves to the situation legally.”
Q. Dr. Kugler, did the imports of dyestuffs from Switzerland play any part in the course of the negotiations?
__________
* Reproduced in part in 2 above.
 
209
Next Page NMT Home Page