. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0255


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 255
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
MR. SPRECHER We have no further examination; but, in view of the testimony that has just come out now, I think it would only be fair if we translated in full the rest of this letter and submitted it to Your Honors and I suspect Dr. Siemers won't object to that.

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: Very well. That may be done.

MR. SPRECHER: I refer to Prosecution's Exhibit 2196, NI-15227.*

MR. SIEMERS: Thank you.


PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: Is that all, Dr. Siemers?

DR. SIEMERS: Yes, that is all.

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: Any further interrogation of this defendant by counsel for the defense? Then you are excused, Dr. ter Meer. 
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
 
E. Russia 
 
1. INTRODUCTION 
 
Paragraphs 114 through 118 of count two of the indictment contain the specifications with respect to “Farben in Russia.” All of the defendants were acquitted of these charges in the judgment of the Tribunal (sec. XIII). The first materials reproduced below on this topic are a number of contemporaneous documents dated between 28 June 1941 and 11 August 1942 (2 below). While the prosecution was offering its documents in support of these charges, the defense objected to the relevance of those documents dealing with synthetic rubber plants in Russia on the ground that the documents at the most showed preliminary planning and did not show any accomplished acts. After hearing argument on that motion, the Tribunal ruled that the documents were at least relevant under count five (common plan or conspiracy to commit crimes against peace), and accordingly, the Tribunal admitted the exhibits in question in evidence. The argument and the interlocutory ruling of the Tribunal are reproduced in 3 below. The next materials reproduced herein are testimony of, or affidavits by, five defendants (4 below). These materials include testimony of the defendant Ambros; an affidavit and testimony of the defendant ter Meer; testimony of the defendant Haefliger; extracts from an affidavit and the testimony of the defendant Ilgner; and testimony of the defendant Mann.
__________
* The full translation of the document is reproduced in 2 above.
 
255
Next Page NMT Home Page